Comment on Steorn's "Introduction to an Orbo Electromagnetic Interaction - Part 1" here. On SteornOfficial, tehnical questions tend to go unanswered and/or deleted. Not here. Feel free to comment here without Steorn censorship.
"there was no degradation of the components after 7 days"(-except for the battery) Sod the digital scope, let me see 2 current probes on the battery:)
At 327% (not including friction) it should EASILY charge a cap-and run from it-in fact you should be able to spin it up by hand & watch it turn forever. Read their 'terms of use' , buy a jar of vaseline, and clear the table :o)
Now they are going to show 'proof' of overunity today at 16:00 GMT-now let's see it run without a battery? i asked them to show me realtime measurements of current in & out, but they declined :)
My last comment on 'Official' is 'pending approval' LOL
"We are being sceptical for a reason, i've been researching this stuff for years, i tested their 'kinetica' models years ago, i built a PMM that would run for 5 minutes (providing you gave it a good shove)-this is just a highly efficient pulse motor-i give them credit for using Thane's coils, that was a slick move- PS i have seen positive proof of overunity, but not from steorn, a true OU machine can run itself, no battery " :o)
No, i don't beleive this. I only beleive what can be replicated, & proven 100%.
Soon as they start saying 'you dont understand it' or they start using flimy excuses to explain the prescence of a battery, then i lose interest very quickly....
No. I only trust what i can replicate myself, or i am given undeniable proof. All the replicas of this thing don't work, McCarthy says 'that's because you dont understand how it works'-patronizing to say the least.
Let me see it run without a battery, & he may have something of interest....
@sacha4you Irish legal faggot
AClarke2007 1 year ago
This looks like replication of Thane Heins's work at Ontario University.
WarzSchoolchild 2 years ago
Nope, the battery's still there..
"there was no degradation of the components after 7 days"(-except for the battery) Sod the digital scope, let me see 2 current probes on the battery:)
At 327% (not including friction) it should EASILY charge a cap-and run from it-in fact you should be able to spin it up by hand & watch it turn forever. Read their 'terms of use' , buy a jar of vaseline, and clear the table :o)
stawmy 2 years ago
Now they are going to show 'proof' of overunity today at 16:00 GMT-now let's see it run without a battery? i asked them to show me realtime measurements of current in & out, but they declined :)
stawmy 2 years ago
My last comment on 'Official' is 'pending approval' LOL
"We are being sceptical for a reason, i've been researching this stuff for years, i tested their 'kinetica' models years ago, i built a PMM that would run for 5 minutes (providing you gave it a good shove)-this is just a highly efficient pulse motor-i give them credit for using Thane's coils, that was a slick move- PS i have seen positive proof of overunity, but not from steorn, a true OU machine can run itself, no battery " :o)
stawmy 2 years ago
No, i don't beleive this. I only beleive what can be replicated, & proven 100%.
Soon as they start saying 'you dont understand it' or they start using flimy excuses to explain the prescence of a battery, then i lose interest very quickly....
stawmy 2 years ago
stawmy, so I'd suggest, you continued to believe.
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago
I can never get my comments in the right place:o)-Don't get me wrong, i still beleive 'overunity' is possible, only this isn't it...
stawmy 2 years ago
No. I only trust what i can replicate myself, or i am given undeniable proof. All the replicas of this thing don't work, McCarthy says 'that's because you dont understand how it works'-patronizing to say the least.
Let me see it run without a battery, & he may have something of interest....
stawmy 2 years ago
stawmy, would you trust your duck to a fox?
;-))
sacha4you 2 years ago