Introduction to an Orbo Electromagnetic Interaction - Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,195
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 20, 2009

Comment on Steorn's "Introduction to an Orbo Electromagnetic Interaction - Part 1" here. On SteornOfficial, tehnical questions tend to go unanswered and/or deleted. Not here. Feel free to comment here without Steorn censorship.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @sacha4you Irish legal faggot

  • This looks like replication of Thane Heins's work at Ontario University.

  • Nope, the battery's still there..

    "there was no degradation of the components after 7 days"(-except for the battery) Sod the digital scope, let me see 2 current probes on the battery:)

    At 327% (not including friction) it should EASILY charge a cap-and run from it-in fact you should be able to spin it up by hand & watch it turn forever. Read their 'terms of use' , buy a jar of vaseline, and clear the table :o)

  • Now they are going to show 'proof' of overunity today at 16:00 GMT-now let's see it run without a battery? i asked them to show me realtime measurements of current in & out, but they declined :)

  • My last comment on 'Official' is 'pending approval' LOL

    "We are being sceptical for a reason, i've been researching this stuff for years, i tested their 'kinetica' models years ago, i built a PMM that would run for 5 minutes (providing you gave it a good shove)-this is just a highly efficient pulse motor-i give them credit for using Thane's coils, that was a slick move- PS i have seen positive proof of overunity, but not from steorn, a true OU machine can run itself, no battery " :o)

  • No, i don't beleive this. I only beleive what can be replicated, & proven 100%.

    Soon as they start saying 'you dont understand it' or they start using flimy excuses to explain the prescence of a battery, then i lose interest very quickly....

  • stawmy, so I'd suggest, you continued to believe.

    ;-))

  • I can never get my comments in the right place:o)-Don't get me wrong, i still beleive 'overunity' is possible, only this isn't it...

  • No. I only trust what i can replicate myself, or i am given undeniable proof. All the replicas of this thing don't work, McCarthy says 'that's because you dont understand how it works'-patronizing to say the least.

    Let me see it run without a battery, & he may have something of interest....

  • stawmy, would you trust your duck to a fox?

    ;-))

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more