Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nuclear weapons: Is there a safe number?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
465 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 24, 2009

Nuclear arms reduction has been at the center of this week's UN meetings. Peter Crail of the Arms Control Association discusses the implications.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't understand, if 500 nuclear warheads are enough the blow the entire planet to smithereens, why the heck do you need 5,700?

  • Everyone, including Israel, need to be included before we can rid ourselves of nuclear weapons.

  • safe number? once again, it's a number that will let the country to destroy its nuclear enemies. the old checked determent factor.

  • don't die of envy, dude. and as far as i remember US has more.

  • Russia has more nukes than the rest of the world combined.

  • more and bigger is better for white countries

  • 2nd

  • There is no SAFE number, of ANY weapon or military installation of this magnitude, until the world can control the fingers that can touch the buttons.

    Change the global consciousness about weapons in general and you will purge the problem .

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more