The Apollo 15 Hammer and Feather experiment

Here I take apart the claims made by David Percy in the film "What Happened on the Moon". His claims are once again shown to be fraudulent, and his methods once again deceptive.

1. The Apollo experiment corresponds to Lunar gravity.
2. The Earth experiment does not correspond to Earth gravity!
3. The Earth hammer hits the fround first.
4. The feather on the Earth experiment is weighted and bounces!
5. The hand holding the feather on Earth is lower.
6. The Earth feather drops predominantly vertically.
7. The slowed down Earth footage does not correspond to Lunar gravity.
8. Footage of "From the Earth to the Moon" has an edit in their depiction.
9. The speeded up Apollo footage, 200% and 150% do not equate to Earth gravity.
10. The speeded up clip looks bizarre and does not show normal motion.




http://www.debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• hammer and feather
• david percy
• what happened on the moon
• apollo hoax
• apollo hoax debunked
• debunking debunk
• apollo moon landings

[RobertoGardi]

Great job Betamax, much better than the work done by me. I'd like to add something. NASA could have slowed down only the part of the video with the falling objects. But then They should have used wires for simulate the jumping of the astronauts. It it is so, it seems that NASA has hanged to the ceiling also each dust particle moved by the feet of the astronauts, because it falls slow too.

[Betamax101]

@RobertoGardi "NASA could have slowed down only the part of the video with the falling objects." I actually was going to include that, but someone got there before me:-

watch?v=0wYUv6wdxuM

They couldn't have done that either:)

[Betamax101]

Thanks. When I started that film, I had no idea of the numerous anomalies in that whole section. It started as a means just to show their experiment was not accurate Lunar gravity, but all those other deceptions were so obvious.

[webfulfill]

David Percy is just praying on people's ignorance. I am a physicist, despite knowing people who worked on the Moon mission and verifying the entire trip to the Moon as one of the first computer programs I wrote, I watched these stupid Moon conspiracy videos anyway. I was not prejudiced. After looking at every piece of evidence, I knew my friend was nuts who told me about this. What can I say? Its no wonder people can get away with real conspiracies, when people can't tell fact from fiction.

[lapmarty]

@benjyboba i work in lab, im in teh canadian forces, i know science, yes fact can be manipulated that is why there peers reviews and sharing data, and double blind etc,

something are fake, but some arent, this is a past time of mine to look in conspiracy and most of them

and the apollo 11 hoax, is my favorite are not truth, and what is interresting is to see why people beleive them, as much if not more then the hoax itself,

[benjyboba]

@lapmarty Scientific facts too can be manipulated from the truth with slightly invalid experiments which can alter the end results. With words like A new world order. To use words of that effect. ORDER, That isn't nice at all. I once watched a documentry on youtube about the russians and sending sputnik roudn the moon. They took this information to america who had no idea initially they were doing such things. This suposedly, could have made america want to do better. Truth we will never know.

[benjyboba]

@lapmarty Well the trouble with sources is reliability, when the source is owned by the liar, then the truth is to suit them and can be made to look that way, companies and groups all stick together and back one another. I'm not taking any sides as I truely am still unsure of the moon but I know even the music industry selling hi-fi is ripping population off through false information, missleading from the truth what makes the quality. I sound like a conspiracist myself but world is full of lies

[lapmarty]

@benjyboba i never said there isnt any conspiracies there are many, politics is al about it, the problem is when it get to science often it is easyly debunk keep growing, like the paul mccartney hoax, the guy is alive and well, and still this isnt proove enought for the beleivers, same with apollo, sometime you cant get away with some stuff and lately evrything converge in that new world order bullshit that probably originaly was truth but got distorted by conspirationist nuts to a global thing

[benjyboba]

@lapmarty Well I have witnessed real life conspiracies myself, where company has told lies to cover their asses. I'm not going to blab it out on net but I am very open minded and accept all possibilities. If you look at history and the past. You can find the real trouble makers of the world, the ones that get involved in all conflicts. search for military timelines and see how the world is constantly at war. Its buisness. This is why I dont diss any conspiracies at all but I am open minded.

[lapmarty]

fact and sources are most of the time ignored by hoaxer, exemple apollo, data, and fact are evrywhere most hoaxer still rely on picture video, and edited stuff made by other hoaxer following the logic behind the paul is dead hoax in the 60s, most people dont seem to grasp that there is over 2000 other sources of data all converging on the reality of those landing, and that do not come from nasa at all, but whos gonna take the time to go anywhere those day, they will just use internet

[lapmarty]

@benjyboba conspiracy hoax beleive are a global phenomenon, and with youtube and internet it took new heights, basicly some of the element are sometime truth, most are false, what is interessting and what most conspirationist dont realize, is that there is a psychological component and expotential grow to it, and the use of picture and finding clue is at the base of most of them, code symbol,

and 99% of the time they are created, and dont exist , look up cranberry paul is dead hoax to get it

[benjyboba]

@lapmarty Facts and sources are as only as good as the lies within them ?, i'm not saying they are lies trying to start up an argument but they can be lies. If the source is own by the liar, then they can use it to their benefit. Anything is possible to fake and techology back then was amazing compaired to what we know about. You hear so many different things, its hard to find out the truth. Anything can be faked. There is many ways to alter, Just because something seems hard it can still b done

[lapmarty]

@TheBaldmeister dont worry id say that 99% of those who beleive in appolo hoax also beleive in the 911 conspircacy, that jfk was shot by his driver and other imbecile claim made by guys like cooper alex jones and other idiot that repeat anything without checking the fact and sources