Pink - PETA Commercial
Top Comments
All Comments (61)
-
This is the only time i will ever agree with PETA. i think animals should be for food not clothes
-
@guineapiglover227 unless it is a bi-product like leater or sheepskin
-
stupidest commercial EVER
-
Ima make a company named GALE. Still need to work on the acronyms.
-
This is where I agree with PETA. I don't think animals should be used for clothing and accessories. Food yes clothes no.
-
am i going to hell for finding this hilarious? because the rabbit made me laugh my ass off.
thank you PETA, you made my day. now shut up
-
I agree on one thing killing animals as for fun is wrong but I mean if it's killed for fun and just let there yea it's wrong but this has purpose
-
That wasn't Ricky gervais that was Russell brand
-
@HazelStar96 I don't think that's the point. PETA has kinda messed up people's thoughts of it, by doing extremely ridiculous stuff. They sued Super Mario, because he has a raccoon hat? Super Tofu Boy? They messed up their cause at that part.
-
hey peta the hells angels wear leather too
go cry to them:)
@B1ZARTv No, we really wouldn't actually. Animals hunt and eat other animals. Most animals are endangered or extinct because we kill them for there fur, to eat, and to test products we do NOT need because we are self-ish people. This comercial hasn't nothing to do with eating animals though. I really hope you did get the message of this comercial. and that you are against animal cruelty. But I guess not everyone can have feelings.
HazelStar96 5 months ago 16
I wonder what PETA thinks of Swamp People.
Obamaislessthanbush 6 months ago 11