Vincent Bugliosi on AntiwarRadio part 3 of 3

Vincent Bugliosi, author and former Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney, discusses his new book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder, Bush's plot to lie the people into war, the deaths of over 4,000 American troops and over 100,000 Iraqis, Bush's October 7th, 2002 speech in Cincinnati, Ohio contradicting the National Intelligence Estimate, Condoleezza Rice's culpability, Bush's meeting with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and intention to provoke Saddam Hussein into war, the people's complicity, the false connection between Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 attacks, the Niger Uranium claim in the 2003 State of the Union address and the possible reasons behind Bush wanting to begin the Iraq War.

MP3 here. (23:28)

Vincent Bugliosi is a bestselling author and former Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney. His new book is called, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder. As a Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney, he successfully prosecuted Charles Manson and several other members of his "family" for the 1969 murders of Sharon Tate and six others. He lost only one of the 106 felony cases he tried as a prosecutor, which included winning 21 out of 21 murder cases.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• charles
• Goyette
• Vinicent
• Bugliosi
• antiwarradio
• George
• Bush
• Iraq

[stebunn]

Excellent program. Bugliosi is a straight shooter whose interests are purely to bring about justice. The conclusions brought by his book on the JFK assassination prove that he NOT the type of person who sees a conspiracy everywhere he looks.

[z8it]

This meaningless Scott McClellan rehash blitz is clearly designed to distract from this powerful book!

We MUST save Our Republic! NOW!

Vincent! - get together with Elizabeth de la Vega and BRING THE CHARGES!

[ishmaiden]

Can you make a post that actually makes sense? I got real proof for you and it doesn't come from some loser truther website. The audio of the collapses actually give you the sounds of the Pancaking when played very slowly. The Other fact is that footage of the outer walls shows the sagging and warping already taking place minutes before the collapses occurred. Also the collapses occurred at the point of impact. It did not occur in the lower parts of the towers or in the cores.WAKE UP LOSER

[ishmaiden]

Yes, the load gets lighter as you go higher. Fucking duh, man. The problem with your bullshit is that thermite/thermate is an used in grenades, dipshit. They don't react well in heat, like with most things. For this "inside job" to work they would have to placed right at the fires. That's after the explosives are able to with stand 500 mph impacts on these very same floors. That's asking far too much and I can tell you that most of any devices placed would be compromised or blown off.

[Rustyshackleford08]

Yes it does make sense, you where talking about military grade explosives. YOU personally know shit. First off the towers were cut perfectly and stacked on trucks. That is done with DEMOLITIONS!

Stop smoking the cock you stupid blind sheep.

[ishmaiden]

" That sentence doesn't make any sense, idiot." That was your nonsensical post. And what are you a fucking mormon? Fact check, some of the Core columns were visible in both towers collapse, idiot. They stood for a good 20-30 seconds after the collapses started. They are more visible in the collapse of the north tower. The core's were not built to stand by themselves and were probably compromised by the collapse of the outer walls and the floors that connected them. GET OFF THE TRUTHER DICK!

[Rustyshackleford08]

They didn't hide the explosions, its what knocked the towers down...just like building 7.

[Rustyshackleford08]

FU, I don't care what your father did. The building fell at the rate of gravity straight down. Its impossible for that to happen without bombs. People there heard explosions before the plane even hit. This is not a pancake collapse because they collumns in the middle of the tower would still be standing and the floors (at least some of them) would have been stacked on a HUGE pile. THEY WERE NOT. So get off the kool aide. I never insulted you so get some manners as well.

[ishmaiden]

The amount of explosives to pull this job in one tower is monumental is to not something you can easily conceal. And to have them placed in the areas of impact is asking a lot of the bombs placed. They would have to first survive the force blast from the planes impacting and they would have to survive the heat from the fires. Any bombs placed would not survive the heat on the those floors and would have a slim chance of working without exploding uncontrollably. DO your homework wannabe sleuth!

[ishmaiden]

These are roughly 20 and 30 story's of floors smahing downwards. The idea that each floor is going to make that that collapsing debris pause 1 second for each floor is absurd. There's too much weight to hold back the fact is that the cores of the twin towers stood for another 20 to 30 seconds after the failure of the outer tube, idiot. Another thing is the fact the failures happened at the point of impact. Placing bombs there and having them survive a 500 mph impact is fanciful. cont.

[ishmaiden]

I'm just curious, but can't you make the same point in one post? All 3 posts say the same fucking thing and are only proof of an inside job simply because you say it it? I got news for you buddy, my father and uncle spent 20 yrs each working with military grade explosive, so don't try to "educate" me as to how a rigged target is supposed to drop. You operate from a false sense assumption that pancaking has to stop at every floor along the way. These are massive pile driver you idiot. cont.

[ishmaiden]

That sentence doesn't make any sense, idiot.