Chomsky - Perle Debate - Part 15

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,786
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 27, 2007

Noam Chomsky and Richard Perle debate US foreign policy at Ohio State University in 1988.

Question from the audience: 'Nicaragua and Roger Miranda'

The sound quality is at times quite poor.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Democratic capitalism is a contradiction in terms, just thought I'd mention that.

  • everything comming of chomsky mouth must be documented and recorder, as a valible asset to humanity for future use..

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @neilwe Are you sure? The definitions of capitalism I've seen didn't necessarily exclude worker controlled enterprise, as far as I could tell. What, specifically, convinced you of this? (I would like a source if you can give one.)

  • Perle was laid out on the floor and Chomsky kept kicking him in the crotch..lol

  • The last question is a bit silly. Of course we should believe it because when you intimidate a country you can expect them to build up their defences.

  • Mike Tyson vs. Terri Shiavo

  • So... lights out for Perle then?

  • "Brave" and "Greedy" those are relitive terms, why dont your state the information as clearly and fully as possible, cite your sources, and let your audience descide if those terms apply. If your arguement is good, you should have nothing to fear because the rational democratic people will accept your logic, and only reject it if they have a more convincing arguement of their own.

  • Excellent example with the Soviet Union and Luxembourg by Chomsky, it almost shows how the US was worse then the USSR in terms of being rational and being just plain tolerant.

  • ok tharnax,yes or no answer,bet you can`t.Correct me if I am wrong but did America not attact Iraq with weapons of mass destruction because it had "weapons of mass destruction"yes or no?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more