A video by CF&P Foundation that builds on the discussion of theory in Part I and evidence in Part II, this concluding video in the series on the Laffer Curve explains how the Joint Committee on Tax...
A video by CF&P Foundation that builds on the discussion of theory in Part I and evidence in Part II, this concluding video in the series on the Laffer Curve explains how the Joint Committee on Taxation's revenue-estimating process is based on the absurd theory that changes in tax policy - even dramatic reforms such as a flat tax - do not effect economic growth. In other words, the current system assumes the Laffer Curve does not exist. Because of congressional budget rules, this leads to a bias for tax increases and against tax cuts. The video explains that "static scoring" should be replaced with "dynamic scoring" so that lawmakers will have more accurate information when making decisions about tax policy. For more information please visit the Center for Freedom and Prosperity's web site: www.freedomandprosperity.org.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
That hit the spot. I believe the GOP will recover in about 20 years. Once when the Bushes, Chaneys, Rumsfield, Rice, Wolfowitz, MCcain, Gingrich, Powell, among others are totally out.
Keynesian economics lost in the 1970s when they said stagflation was impossible and it happened.
The problem with the Laffer curve is that it is based on the assumption there is some perfect level of taxation that maximizes income after tax withholding and revenues. However the government will not practice the restraint necessary to balance a budget, as evidenced by both Reagan and Bush's administrations. This leads Keynesians to say its the cuts themselves since they won't stop spending.
If by balancing a budget you mean stripping services to the point they are no logner functional or raising taxation so high that productivity grinds to a halt, yes you are correct. However the mentality that has gripped the United States that a deficit is just a matter of fact way of running the government is detrimental and is one of the foundational causes of the current economic crisis. Deficits were originally intended only for emergencies such as wars, not for building a welfare state.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
The problem with the Laffer curve is that it is based on the assumption there is some perfect level of taxation that maximizes income after tax withholding and revenues. However the government will not practice the restraint necessary to balance a budget, as evidenced by both Reagan and Bush's administrations. This leads Keynesians to say its the cuts themselves since they won't stop spending.
In the long run, it's necessary.
Thanks for the correction, wreddon.