Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Laffer Curve, Part III: Dynamic Scoring (old version)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
12,871
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 18, 2008

A video by CF&P Foundation that builds on the discussion of theory in Part I and evidence in Part II, this concluding video in the series on the Laffer Curve explains how the Joint Committee on Taxation's revenue-estimating process is based on the absurd theory that changes in tax policy - even dramatic reforms such as a flat tax - do not effect economic growth. In other words, the current system assumes the Laffer Curve does not exist. Because of congressional budget rules, this leads to a bias for tax increases and against tax cuts. The video explains that "static scoring" should be replaced with "dynamic scoring" so that lawmakers will have more accurate information when making decisions about tax policy. For more information please visit the Center for Freedom and Prosperity's web site: www.freedomandprosperity.org.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The conservative movement was detroyed by Neo-Conservatives or the "hawks" you refer to. They defected from the traditional conservative views, and adopted a "we know best policy" instead of the small government, small taxes principles that are two underlying supports of conservatism. The republican party is not filled with them, they just happen to be the leaders of it, sadly.

  • This static system is an outrage. Why didn't Republicans fix it when they controlled Congress?!?

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @wreddon it's a theory that addresses the relationship between the tax rate and national production. It makes sense from optimizing federal revenue based on the behavior of taxpayers, but the current static scoring model is the problem for everyone in Washington.

  • We might have a Constitutional Amendment adjusting tax rates to the where the 'inflection point' is on the left side of the Laffer curve!

    Also, we must be careful to assume that more government revenue is a good thing! The goal is not necessarily always higher government revenue but rather a a prosperous economy!

  • @wreddon I have a friend with an Economics degree who was a Keynesian when he graduated. Afterward he joined his family business. With in less than a year the government taxed the Keynesian out of him. Its amazing how reality and academics are so opposed.

  • its amuzing when he says "common sence is a commodity in washiington"because that was the conclusion i came to a long time ago.didnt want to believe it but now im moew than positive that that is true.WHY THE FUCK ARE WE ALLOWING THESE FUCK TARDS TO RUN OUR COUNTR?PLEASE SOMEONE EXPLAIN THAT TO ME.

  • why do you assume these types people would just up and leave congress?

  • That hit the spot. I believe the GOP will recover in about 20 years. Once when the Bushes, Chaneys, Rumsfield, Rice, Wolfowitz, MCcain, Gingrich, Powell, among others are totally out.

  • Well said.

  • Braves beat the Mets 9-3. Now that's what I like to see.. also the video was great. lol

  • Agreed.

    Thanks for the correction, wreddon.

  • What circular reasoning?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more