Courts admit consent is needed to enact interim care order

This is a proof that the courts admit in an order (offer) that they need consent from all parties (so it is a blatant contract).
The video quality is not very good, but i apologize for this and read you through it anyway, so you may know clearly what it says and what it means.
I am qualified as a teacher of the English language, which adds professional credibility to my explanation of the grammar and punctuation of a most interesting part of this order revealing thereby the reason for the chosen method of construction of the sentence in question.

"The Court Directs that the application be adjourned to 10th March 2010 at 10:30 am before a District Judge in a court at Principal Registry of the Family Division, First Avenue House, 42-49 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6NP for consideration of the making of a further interim care order; if all parties consent to the making of a further interim order, the application may be dealt with without attendance, in accordance with the postal procedure."

The part of the "order" (offer, in reality) in question is

"IF ALL PARTIES CONSENT TO THE MAKING OF A FURTHER INTERIM ORDER, THE APPLICATION MAY BE DEALT WITH WITHOUT ATTENDANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POSTAL PROCEDURE."

"CONSENT" IS THE KEY WORD THEY WISH TO TAKE AWAY THE FOCUS FROM; AND SO THEY EMPLOY A LITTLE NLP TECHNIQUE HERE TO TRY TO PUT THE MAIN FOCUS ON HOW THE PROCEDURE MAY BE DEALT WITH BY CONSTRUCTING THE SENTENCE SO THE LAST THING SAID IS WHAT YOUR ATTENTION IS FOCUSED ON, THAT BEING THE PROCEDURE BY WHICH THE APPLICATION MAY BE DEALT WITH AS AFOREMENTIONED.

THE SENTENCE COULD READ,

"THE APPLICATION MAY BE DEALT WITH WITHOUT ATTENDANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POSTAL PROCEDURE, IF ALL PARTIES CONSENT TO THE MAKING OF A FURTHER INTERIM ORDER."

BUT THEN THIS WOULD DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT THEY NEED YOUR CONSENT, AND SO THEY WOULD NEVER CONSTRUCT THE SENTENCE IN THIS FASHION.
THAT IS BECAUSE THEN EVERYBODY WOULD JUST SEE THE REMEDY STRAIGHT AWAY AND THIS WOULD DOOM ANY CHANCES OF THE JUDGE RULING IN FAVOUR OF ANYTHING THAT NOT EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM AGREES UPON.
THIS WOULD ALSO EXPOSE THE FACT THAT IT IS BETTER TO JUST REPRESENT YOURSELF.
THERE ARE WAYS OF DOING THIS WITHOUT AGREEING TO THE WORDING "NOTICE OF ACTING IN PERSON" AND ENTERING ON A DIFFERENT BASIS. BUT THAT IS A DIFFERENT ISSUE ALTOGETHER.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• courts
• HMCS
• Principal
• of the
• Family
• Division
• evil
• sorcerers
• Freemasons
• Order of the Eastern Star
• Theosophists
• Common Purpose
• judge hallon
• judge million
• consent
• needed
• to
• enact
• an
• interim
• care
• order

[meatisdeliciouse]

I would be so happy if care orders were removed, they are a dangerouse abuse of power and people get them for no reson. It is disgusting. PEople under them have no fredoms and practicaly no life. What gives someone the right to take away every last fredom of an adult who hasent even been arested or charged with anything? The police don't "care." Care is completely incomatent and abusive, we treat inocent people like criminals, and it hase got to stop, NOW.

[meatisdeliciouse]

Care orders are a bunch of bull shit desinged to take away fredoms of completely inocent people. The government need to repel this disgusting law ASAP. People who end up with care orders are practicaly prisoners, and get treated like babies. The put care orders on people who arent even disabled, and when your in care you are treated like a peice of shit. This is absolutely disgusting and needs romeved. We shouldent be incarsorating inocent people, it is wrong.

[greywolf424]

@thered702 YOUR MESSAGE IS NOTHING BUT A JOKE AND SO ARE YOU.

[AnabolicMutant]

@thered702

a man fell from a high building and landed on a car and survived and was fine, got up ran across the road shouting with joy that he was alive and then got hit and killed by a truck! We do not create! Only the almighty creates!

We choose by our will to do things, but our will can never and overpower the will of the almighty.

[AnabolicMutant]

@thered702

The hypnotic spell was induced by music, the news, TV programs, films, games, etc.

Also, we are NOT the creators of anything. And we certainly do NOT create our own destiny. I can prove this innumerable ways. I shall furnish a few examples:

Man fell from plane and parachute didn't open neither did reserve, landed in a field and survived (this is true and happened not long ago),

[AnabolicMutant]

@thered702

"Entering a contract in dishonour of it" in terms of contracts would mean they lied about any qualifying attributes or details that may have been necessary in order to make such a contract. It doesn't mean using sneaky underhand tactics, and if you think about it you will see that as i said before, none of it is actually hidden. It's all there in front of our faces and you know it. It's just that we were propagandized and under a hypnotic spell before.

[AnabolicMutant]

@thered702

No, unfortunately, you are not right. They say there is no excuse of ignorance to something in the law. Therefore, just because we had our eyes blindfolded and didn't expect these things to be the case we didn't see them there right in front of us the whole time. Their argument will be that none of this was EVER hidden from you and has always been in plain sight and we are in fact the stupid ones if we couldn't see it before. I'm only telling it the way they will put it. >

[thered702]

@greywolf424 typical. cannot attack the message, so attack the messenger. sad little man.

[greywolf424]

@thered702 "in accordance with contractual law. "

.

SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.

[thered702]

@AnabolicMutant and if the contract was entered in dishonour, it would be lawfully null and void ab initio. in accordance with contractual law.