Network Coverage of Fort Hood? Fox News O'Reilly Rips MSM Politically Correct PAP!

Network Coverage of Fort Hood? Fox News O'Reilly Rips MSM Politically Correct PAP!

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• Network
• Coverage
• Fort
• Hood
• Fox
• News
• O'Reilly
• Terror
• Muslim
• Politically
• Correct
• CNN
• ABC
• MSNBC
• Time
• esling
• hugh

[mbostrom]

terrorism and islam are not the same thing...i deeply dislike islam just like i dislike chistianity and judaism and even buddhism .. but terrorism isn't usually defined by why it's carried ou but bt how it's carried out.

This seems to me to be on the verge of terrorism but probaely not terrorism but more like simple dishusting maniacial and religiously mitivated massmurder.

Besdies, calling this man a terrorist isn't some terible punishment to him, it would only have made him feel more importa

[freakyphysicsguy]

We are not carpet bombing Iraq, we are precision bombing it, there's an ENORMOUS difference. The reason we didn't jump straight into WW2 is that there was a strong isolationist movement in the US at that time, had we jumped in without an attack first being made on us we would've had almost as many people against the war as are against this war. We were a hugely significant part of Nazi Germany's defeat, without us the Russians would've had a much longer war.

[kmardes]

maybe we should bomb the shit out of your holier than thou neighborhood, to 'stop the spread of' american right wing-ism... see how you like it you fucktard.

go jack off to some john wayne flick now....

[abbienetvision]

kmar,

You are an idiot, so trying to explain it to you is a waste of time.

War is war, get it through your thick moronic skull, which clearly is tainted and damaged due to the koran.

[kmardes]

vietnam was to stop communism from spreading? give a a fuc$ing you idiot.

communism STILL ended up 'spreading' there.. and, so what?? communism was A LOT BETTER than american bombs you asshole.

ww2, the russians stopped the nazis, NOT the americans. u.s. didn't volunteer to fight nazis, they entered the war relatively late because nazis declared war on them.

you're making this TOO easy for me.

[abbienetvision]

kmar,

Every war civilians get killed, that is part of war. Vietnam was to stop the communism from spreading.

WWII was to stop the Nazi world take over. It was a war, with soldiers in uniform, not like the Muslim pussies who dress as civilians and fights as soldiers among the civilians. Or open fire in an army base, where you have received your education, your salary, and everything to give you a good life.

Muslims are terrorists and bite the hand that feeds them, then complain!

[MrTnebwa]

terminology is highly scrutinized, so why the omissions? It seems clear the media is downplaying the massacre.ironic. what are Americans suppose to do., pay to be victims of terrorists?

[kmardes]

oh, i see, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians has nothing to do with it... ok, now its clear to me.

do you think the rest of the world goes by your definition regarding, say, vietnam, or mine?

[abbienetvision]

km,

This is about terrorism, not war. It is not the same thing, as you seem to think.

Vietnam was a war, as was WWII, but this is terrorism by Americans in America, and it has nothing to do with Iraq/Vietnam/Germany/etc.

[kmardes]

well, the attack hasn't even remotely been confimred to be because of 'terror'...

he was a major in the u.s. army, so, call it what you want.

religiously based? probably... what is 'terror'?

is america's carpet bombing of vietnam and iraq terror?

how come THAT isn't mentioned??????