Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Re: philosophy of will, 1.0

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
77 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 2, 2009

Video Cam Direct Upload

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (donnachaidh)

  • A minor point. Humans have will and stones don't. This is because, humans go all the way down (I mean its influenced by quantum phenomena.) While stones are influenced strickly by newtonian mechanics.

  • Stones absolutely go all the way down.

  • The objective tends to be more useful. The subjective tends to be more wonderful.

    Speaking of wonderful, where did that girl go?

  • Where do girls go?

  • ug, you mean you don't know which girl I am talking about? I guess you got many girls hanging out with you.

  • That isn't what I meant... It was a rhetorical question.

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Stones are not influenced by quantum probablistic phenomea. (Here I am assuming that quantum proablistic phenomea produces: Will.) But brain chemical may very well be indluenced by quantum probablisitc phenomena. (I mean, where else can we expect to find free will. And neurons are just small enough to make the difference. Small enough to be influenced by quantum mechanical probablity. Stone not.)

  • 6:49 "how to fuck you over"? Did I hear you right?

    As for micro and macro physics we do live in them. Think of the brain. This electrical signals going here and there. Isn't that fast enough and small enough for us to experience.

    Sometimes I feel like reality is slippering away. We don't always exist in Newtonian mechanics.

  • That's a question of your attitude toward will, causality, and determinism.

    Suppose that engaging in behavior we would call self-educating, self-shaping, self-improving, thought-cultivating, etc. boiled down entirely to genetic predisposition and a confluence of the right environmental factors to set the behavior into effect.

    This may or may not be the actual case, but if it is it implies something radically different about that behavior and its worth.

    Otherwise yes, I think you're right.

  • Very lucid.

    You say we're just educating ourselves about the gods of our time when pursuing a subject w/out any direct utility or applicability in the world, but aren't we still shaping ourselves in some sense by cultivating an inquisitive nature that ultimately affects our behavior down the line?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more