Zeitgeist - 9/11 (Part 3 of 4)

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIB6z4fkINs
Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK4C-1BP9Zw
Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP8Fokrv8Dk
Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5kjLQAm5pU


'Zeitgeist, The Movie' and 'Zeitgeist: Addendum' were created as Not-for-Profit expressions
to communicate what the author felt were highly important social understandings which
most humans are generally not aware of. The first film focuses on suppressed
historical & modern information about currently dominant social institutions, while
also exploring what could be in store for humanity if the power structures at large continue
their patterns of self-interest, corruption, and consolidation

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• zeitgeist
• 9/11
• conspiracy

[Jakerado55]

Lol at George W. Bush trying to speak smoothly. Hes a horrible liar. Can we please all agree on that?

[jwallbanger]

It's just so sad. 9/11 is such an obvious hose job, but people will not accept a truth that runs so contrary to their fictitious world view. They will accept any other explanation, no matter how ridiculous, than face this traumatizing fact.

I wonder if all of civilization was enabled by these rose-colored lenses built in to the ordinary human psyche.

To fight for and defend the truth is to be ostracized, ridiculed, and often lonely. I can see the allure of the blue pill. But it's just so sad.

[brassbonanza97]

@jwallbanger Absolutely not. Thanks to how uniquely designed the building was, it came down as expected. If it was in fact a controlled demolition, then how did the FDNY know that it would collapse, more than two hours before it happened? Were they in on it?

[jwallbanger]

@brassbonanza97 i think you know what i meant, you just needed a hair to split. if it had fallen naturally there would have been resistance on the way down, giant chunks of building left. it would have fallen any direction but straight down. it behaved like a typical cd coming straight down into a pile of rubble. all joints had to have broken simultaneously for it to come down that fast with so little resistance. only cd can make a building come apart so completely so fast.

[brassbonanza97]

@jwallbanger On the contrar, it actually did not fall into a "neat little plie". WTC 7 completely ravaged 30 West Broadway to the north, which needed to be demolished due to the damage it caused and fell all over Barclay Street. A controlled-demolition is done to minimize damage to the surrounding area. This, however, was a lot of damage.

[jwallbanger]

@brassbonanza97 I've already heard people talk about the building being "tilted," "bowing" and "unstable," that isn't new to me. Though opposing evidence may exist, the argument I countered with presumes you correct about that. So I don't know what you're all miffed about.

Again, the building being tilted does not explain how it suddenly came apart and fell into a neat little pile. That's like a tree leaning toward it's ax cut, then falling straight down into a pile of cord wood.

[brassbonanza97]

@jwallbanger I'm trying hard to avoid evidence, yet you didn't even address the fact that I posted a link where a FDNY firefighter talks on the issue. Funny how that works.

[jwallbanger]

@brassbonanza97 Lots and lots of firefighters and civilians describing in detail hearing explosions. There's no way they could be talking about anything else in almost every quote I heard. A security guard who saw a man on a lower floor walk away from a blast with skin hanging off his arms. Explosions heard by too many people to be false. I just feel like you're trying very hard to ignore the evidence. People who have a certain world view will ignore evidence that threatens it.

[brassbonanza97]

@jwallbanger I'm not going to pretend I know structural engineering like most twoofers do, but I do know that on an airing of the Opie & Anthony show, a retired FDNY firefighter who was at the scene stated that the building was titled. ( watch?v=Kuu5m6-blIE ) Stars around the 4:45 mark. I'm sure they heard explosions, too! Lots of combustable material inside the buildings, plus, some of those FF quotes were taken out of context; they were talking about people hitting the ground from jumping.

[jwallbanger]

@brassbonanza97 If it was tilted, why did it come straight down? Buildings have multiple supports. All would have to give simultaneously for building 7 to come down the way it did. Simple physics. In a natural collapse the weak point would be the area it fell toward, like a tree with a wedge cut out. The way it came down perfectly straight at near freefall is not possible w/o CD. Firefighters also heard explosions, lots of them, and some FF's have been coerced into silence too.

[brassbonanza97]

@jwallbanger Well, you're wrong on a few things. Firefighters report fires on almost every single floor and the building was titled due to a ton of debris from WTC1 hitting it during it's collapse. The firefighters knew it was coming down due to it's titling and the fires. At 3:30 PM, FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro made the decision to halt operations, knowing it would collapse and wishing to prevent further loss of firefighter life. A full two hours before it actually collapsed.

[jwallbanger]

@brassbonanza97 I wasn't talking about the twin towers. The Achilles' Heel of the official story is building 7, and that one came down exactly like the other two but no plane hit it. All it had was some exterior damage and some small, oxygen starved fires. It came down near freefall speed into it's own footprint, perfectly. That is no minor anomaly, that is a HUGE glaring hole in the official theory. Find one other building that EVER did that from fire. There aren't any.