Bruce Lipton-Spontaneous Evolution 1 of 11.mp4

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Bruce
• Lipton
• Esoteric
• Agenda
• Ben
• Stewart
• Consciousness
• Conscious
• Conscience
• Anger
• Fear
• Emotion
• Male
• Female
• NWO
• New
• World
• Order
• Government
• Oppression
• Suppression
• Tyranny
• Control
• Hate
• Spirit
• Spiritual
• Ascension
• Decision
• Freedom
• Liberty
• Justice
• Kymatica

[MrVenus85]

Why have all of henriquesouza77's comments been removed? Would be nice to be able to look through the convo.

[detersbb]

hrntiqurdoxa77 was made to look like a fool and realized it & removed his own comments. I have a PDF file of the comments before he deleted them somewhere.

He realized he was making absolutely silly points & deleted his own comments I did not delete them. It really is too bad, b/c he did such a wonderful job of making the case that the scientific community was a group of like minded blockheads incapable of anything but consensus think.

[SangMarocain]

neurotheology

[44prot]

@henriquesouza77 Do you really believe that I, or anyone else, need you to police my thoughts, ideas, and beliefs? Are you associated with some government agency? Because, really, that is something one associated with that type would try. Go do, think, believe what you wish, but, get out of everyone else's business, PLEASE!

[Dizinsightful]

@henriquesouza77:

5) "science... HAS to be published, tested and confirmed by other scientist to be considered true." Again, this is false. The information needs to be presented in order to be considered. It should be tested in order to be confirmed, but most people do not re-enact an experiment before blindly believing it as gospel. Have you ever reproduced Gallileo's works?

You might remember Gallileo as one of the 1st people to challenge the scientific community's belief of heliocentricism.

[Dizinsightful]

@henriquesouza77:

4) "ANY scientific method HAS to be published so the ENTIRE scientific community can judge, evaluate and reproduce." No, this is false. It's a nice idea, but it isn't true. Btw, I hope you realize that the ENTIRE scientific community is very large, all inclusive, and rarely agrees on every thing. Especially the religious scientists, you know, creation vs. evolution?

[Dizinsightful]

@henriquesouza77:

1) In an open system and especially Quantum Mechanics, it is nigh implausible to have ALL the facts, particularly since both are immeasurably large systems, the latter of which is almost purely theoretical.

2) When using the term BY DEFINITION, you really should have a word you are defining, by definition.

3) When someone says, "This is what we found," and it is on video, it is considered to be a 1st person source of information, which is a cite-able source.

[Dizinsightful]

@henriquesouza77: "stop judging my arguments flawed or problematic." I think this underlines the real reason you guys are not meeting on common grounds. If an argument is flawed, it isn't a sound argument. If it isn't sound, it cannot be true. I think the reason your argument is unsound is because your premises aren't well-founded. I'll explain.

[Katharsis540]

"old science"that just stagnated growth and hey science holds no label,plus let say yeah corporation also give children an education ever heard The Trivium Education?

[freeteepee]

its so cool. either you believe it and it works or you dont and you stay... jerk. this is like the failsafe system. it´s so cool !