Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

WTC 7 Pyroclastic Flow

Explosive energy creates pyroclastic flows. These are visible in only two circumstances: 1) Controlled Demolition and 2) Volcanic Eruption  
 
Customize

More From: lnielsen76

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
74 ratings
Sign in to rate
47,717 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (149)   Options

Loading...
Nuker1337 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The explosive energy comes from the gravitational potential in the towers released in their collapse.
simsun2 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
how the fuck is it a pyroclastic flow? A pyroclastic flow is a beutiful killer of nature not something created by sky scrapers. If those people had been in a real pyroclastic flow, there body fluids would boil and the wind pipe and lungs would be destroyed with seconds of taking the first breath
sadakokid45 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
if this was a pyroclastic flow, millions would be dead, all of new york city would be dead, and the flow would spill out into brooklyn and surrounding neigborhoods.
evilwarlord4 (4 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
This is idiotic. A true pyroclastic flow would have incinerated NYC.
matrixbadger9 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i agree it would of completely destroyed the surrounding area even accross to brooklyn, the spectators would be vaproized
IPVentertainment (5 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
A pyroclastic flow is an avalanche of fluidized sulphur dioxide, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, volcanic ash and pumice debris superheated to ~900 degrees Celsius, moving at speeds of up to 700 kilometers per hour, and traveling up to 100-200 kilometers from the vent which emitted it. The WTC cloud was a ground-hugging cloud of cold pulverized concrete and metal traveling at ~50 kilometers per hour and traveling 1 kilometer from the source. There's a lot of difference.
Mystylplx (5 months ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
You have convinced me. I can deny the truth no longer. The evidence is simply overwhelming. I am finally forced to admit that...

...the buildings were destroyed by volcanoes.
anglocowboy (5 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
This was just silly. Pyroclastic flows are super-heated plumes of gas and ash ejected from volcanoes. If WTC had emitted them (WTC emitted dust clouds and construction debris, by the way) then the people engulfed by them would've been incinerated. They were not. Completely aside from the kook theory this is trying to promote, the "science" was simply ridiculous.
FSMLosst (6 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Of course he is. You've got to (taking a pull off the doobie) see the big picture man. You see, it's totally a volcano in NYC because (adjusting my tinfoil hat) Bush is the devil so he can create a volcano anywhere. Look at the raw footage man. That's no plane... it's a space station.

Now that you know, they'll probably come after you too. Don't worry, it's safe here in my mom's basement. The truth is out there man!
Tom88116 (7 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
What are you trying to prove here? Any large building collapsing will create a similar effect to that, whether it's demolition was controlled or not. Also, comparing collapsing buildings to volcanoes is stupid, sure the dust spreads, but for different reasons and, clearly, under different circumstances.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.