Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Funny - Christopher Hitchens Dodging the question (comments enabled)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,141
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 17, 2010

The original video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TAXarsorbY posted by 2sedated had all of its comments removed and adding comments has been disabled.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 124 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • You're an idiot:

    Agnosticism - An assertion that it is impossible to know whether a god or gods exist or do not exist.

    Atheism - A lack of belief in a god or gods, NOT A TRUTH CLAIM THAT GOD DOES NOT EXIST. GET IT RIGHT.

    Again, you're an idiot, and so is Craig.

  • Demanding proof that something doesn't exist is nonsense, and it's strange that some people don't seem to understand that.

see all

All Comments (82)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dumbest video ever, go buy a 'philosophy for dummies' book. You either believe in a god out of faith like a theist or out of logic like a deist or you reserve judgement like an agnostic or you go all the way in stating the lack of evidence for 'god' makes it not true and are therefore an atheist.

  • @MrShoeguy Thank you for your valued input, but you are still mistaken. :)

  • @humanfly78 There is no word for anything as stupid as your definition of agnosticism, atheism is the belief that there is no god, and idiocy is the idea that a dumb fuck like you would know anything.

  • This video is dishonest, evasive, misleading, and utterly bankrupt of integrity. Just like religion.

  • Aw. Did Hitchens say something wrong about the magical sky daddy? :-)

  • Craig offers a meaningless question. Essentially he asks "Why dont you beleive in my a-priori assumptions?' and then trying to force Hitchens to claim whether he actively or inactively rejects the assumption...the question is meaningless. Craig is not very bright so doesnt understand that rejecting assumptions dont really need further quantification.

  • Hitchens is trying to explain why it is a stupid distinction. Everything we believe, we believe on the balance of probabilities. I am almost completely certain that 9/11 was not an inside job, for example. I can't prove that 9/11 wasn't an inside job, but the theory to me simply doesn't make a whole lot of sense. This is how sane people think about things, and form beliefs.

  • @ilovenarwhales

    There is nothing factual about your comment, hence my response. Perhaps you are a closet theist.

    This last bit doesn't even relate to the video or the comment I made. Where exactly are you going with this?

    EDIT- Doesn't take a genius to realize I'm NOT the uploader..

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more