Thousands...Not Billions

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,743
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 19, 2008

by Larry Vardiman

Radioisotope dating has become the standard method for estimating the age of the Earth. Yet, the millions and billions of years estimated by this method conflicts with the thousands of years that the Bible indicates to be the age of the Earth. An eight-year research project designed to explore the claims of radioisotope dating for an old earth and to offer a young-earth alternative will be completed by the Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society in 2005. The RATE project has found several major pieces of evidence that radioisotope dating is in error by a factor of many orders of magnitude and rocks commonly thought to be billions of years old may only be thousands of years old. This talk summarizes the project and discusses its major findings.
Topics Include:

The Age Issue
Assumptions of Radioisotope Dating
RATE Hypothesis
Findings of the RATE Group
http://www.nwcreation.net

Northwest Creation Network
23208 55th Ave W.
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
206-465-1635
contact@nwcreation.net

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 82 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (459)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MrVirtualCoder Darwin's daughter died so that helped him make a great discovery ?!?

    ''Are you kidding me''?

    The time scale of the earth is defined by the fossil record.

    The K-T boundry is defined by the extinction event, whenever it was.

    The Age of the Dinosaurs is when the dinosaurs live, is that too hard for you to understand.

  • @gregrutz Are you kidding me? The time scale of the Earth was changed to FIT the Evolutionary theory of how the live on Earth began and evolved. Charles Darwin was a Christian himself, but became futile towards his religion when his daughter died. Clearly! He were experiencing emotional problems which made him attempt to remove God from his theory. During the Modernistic movements, these fallacies became truth.

  • RATE Group assumes the rate of radioactive decay changed to fit the bible. LOL

    Carl NEVER say ''billions and billions''  Stop making shit up.

  • The web site talkorigins addresses the problem with finding carbon 14 in coal as possible fungi and bacteria contamination. However they admit this is a hypothesis and “research is ongoing.” The talkorigins article was from 2002, so has there been any progress, or is “research is ongoing” the only answer?

  • @TheDarkLordLucifer Hi. Is this a self-written poem or what? And what is it's meaning/purpose? I'm curious because I've seen you post it several times.

  • Darkened powers caressing my mind. In my unveiling, a body of shade. My heart, his infernal tongue. Blasphemous rituals lead the way to Lucifer. We adore the work of the devil. On the path of evil incarnation. He is below and above you. His life is ecstasy in yours. Under the inverted cross of the lord. See your soul in the black dimension. Pray to the weak gods of infinity. Your shattered prayers are forgotten. You are a stranger to our champion. I will lead you to the throne of Old Nick.
  • @AndyG792 It's not about indocrination, it's about fact! Unfortunately creationists can't come to deal with that and so have to come with this plot that everyone is being brainwashed by someone into evolution. Quite frankly, don't you think it is odd that you, an uneducated person in this area believes in this theory, whilst all the experts another? Creation has no scientific basis whatsoever, hence why no scientific paper have been written on it EVER.

  • @TheGamanic that depends on how indoctrinated a person is in evolution. I truly believe if you or any other person would honestly think through both scientific evidences for evolution and creation, instead of being closed minded to the creation evidences, you will see that the evidences for creation is a lot more viable. It's a lot more scientific and not as conjectural. as evolution is. the RATE project predicted correctly as to where the graph would fall before they got the results back.

  • @TheDarkLordLucifer you are praying to the wrong person. Satan does not give love nor peace. I read the end of the book and know how it turns out. I hope you would open your mind and truly think things through. God does not want anyone to to be cast in the lake of fire, that is why the Bible says that He waits for people to reent and turn to him because, He loves you so much that He sent His Son to take the punishment for all of our sins. It's free, all you have to do is accept salvation.

  • @irishbarrycooper I guess I would say that would it be the fact that all those separate disciplines of science fit together to give a coherent picture of world history which is only explicable through evolution. For example the fossil record fits perfectly with genetic differences. This cannot be explained by biblical creation without resorting to ridiculous explanations, which you no doubt believe in

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more