Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Kay Hagan Responds to Dole's "Godless" Attack Ad

October 29, 2008 on CNN (CNN) — The already-contentious North Carolina Senate race took a brutal turn Wednesday after incumbent Sen. Elizabeth Dole released a television ad suggesting challenger K...  
 
Customize

More From: AtheistMediaBlog

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
139 ratings
Sign in to rate
61,794 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (4)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (341)   Options

Loading...
Myschly (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"We've got to leave it there", oh it's too much. I wonder what important news they went to after that...

On to the issue though: Even myself who'd gladily call myself godless, thinks this ad is just insanely appalling. This is below the belt with crushing force. Pathetic doesn't even begin to describe it.
BryanNC08 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It was stupid for Dole to put out that Ad but I hate Kay Hagan. She can represent everyone else but not me. fuck you cunt.
specklyjim (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
priests like to get in the mix even when they have no evidence to bring to the debate because abortion, contraception, etc, are frequently used by lower socio-economic groups and poorly educated sections of society. by artificially reducing their normally high birth-rates, these groups slow the growth of the religious denomination down, something which, for the many centuries since it's inception, the Catholic church has desperately fought. I apologize for the many generalisations I've made.
specklyjim (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
jesus doesn't like Dragoongrl OR 5506, because they both routinely make atrocious spelling and grammatical errors, showcasing their lack of any real knowledge. both are making partisan opinion-based arguments that will never reach the other side. The question should be "when, exactly, does the fertilised gamete become a sentient being, and how exactly do we define that?"

That, i believe, is a empirical, scientific question with an empirical, scientific answer.
5506 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
now you are just being ignorant.

good talk tho. its unfortunate that ur so closed-minded.
Dragoongrl (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes a good talk

Hm should have taken your opinion frome the get go seeing as how im close-minded i didn't see the parallels between teenagers and fetus'. [sarcasm]

-angel
5506 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
teenagers and fetus's in the bigger picture are exactly the same. HUMAN.

Jesus loves you.
tonypeters69 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
OK! Heres the real truth! hahahahah

But really, as individuals we all have a different perspective. Can we agree on that?!?
THAT is the whole of pro-choice! Let the pregnant women decide what they want to do. NO one else can say what is their best choice for THEIR lives. If Nature or God decided otherwise, it would be otherwise.
5506 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
lets let the fetus make the choice.
Dragoongrl (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
indeed.

-angel

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.