Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Grayson v. Broun on the Constitution

This is Rep. Alan Grayson and Rep. Paul Broun discussing a bill to deny funds to one specific named organization in a Science and Technology markup. Such a bill is known as 'a bill of attainder'.  
 
Customize

More From: RepAlanGrayson

Alan Grayson Introduces Amendment to Stop People From Going Broke or Homeless3:38
3,928 views
Rep. Alan Grayson on Rachel Maddow: No One Cares About Bipartisanship7:49
6,881 views
Alan Grayson on Bill Maher: GOP Health Care Reform Would Be Letting You Bring A Gun to the Doctor7:39
38,901 views
Rep. Alan Grayson: "The teabaggers are no longer obeying their corporate paymasters..."3:32
13,024 views
Rep. Alan Grayson: "Has the Federal Reserve Ever Tried to Manipulate the Stock Market?"5:42
118,025 views
$1.2 Trillion Slush Fund: Congressman Alan Grayson Grills Fed Vice Chair Donald Kohn6:18
138,054 views
Rep. Alan Grayson on What It Means to Be a Democrat7:44
5,641 views
Alan Grayson on the Worst Deal Since Manhattan Was Sold for $24 in Trinkets5:18
78,808 views
MSNBC: Alan Grayson on GOP on the Olympics: "Someone should remind them what team they're really on"4:53
10,558 views
Alan Grayson Questions AIG Math: Let's Change the Length of Inches So I'm Shorter!5:59
24,970 views
Rep Alan Grayson on Hardball: We can't run this country based on Republican hissy fits7:48
13,429 views
Alan Grayson: Republicans "probably wish there were a Nobel Prize for fear"2:57
9,372 views
Rep. Alan Grayson: "Hank Paulson Had a $700M Conflict of Interest"7:22
39,842 views
Alan Grayson on Countdown with Keith Olbermann: Olympia Snowe's Vote is Too Expensive7:19
5,998 views
Alan Grayson Questions CEO Edward Liddy on AIG Cover-up2:25
38,612 views
Former Republican Stops By to Thank Alan Grayson for Standing Up on Health Care3:37
12,658 views
Watch the Speech the Republicans Don't Want You to See9:40
11,372 views
Part Three: Republicans Attempt to Cut Off Rep. Alan Grayson's Speech1:55
118,889 views
Rep. Alan Grayson Announces a Hearing on Ron Paul's Bill to Audit the Federal Reserve (HR 1207)1:03
28,151 views
Alan Grayson on the Ed Schultz Show: Response Has Been "Overwhelmingly Positive"8:09
19,050 views

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
808 ratings
Sign in to rate
116,611 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (1,263)   Options

Loading...
VirginiaNative1689 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
Whether this is a bill of attainder is irrelevant because the funding of such organizations is unconstitutional to begin with. Funding those organizations is not a delegated or enumerated power given to the Congress by the Constitution.
axollot (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Like funding the MIC corps i.e Blackwater? Or my personal favorite, funding religious orgs to provide charity to the neediest folks in our communities? It goes both ways.
VirginiaNative1689 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Where did I say that those things should be funded? I don't think any religious organizations should be funded. But don't tell that to Obama because he expanded on Bush's "faith-based initiative" programs. And I certainly don't believe that mercenaries should be funded to help fight an unconstitutional war. I'm not picking and choosing anything. All of these things are unconstitutional and Grayson is not being consistent.
el100783 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Yeah, I'm sure Grayson has a deep misunderstanding of the constitution. It's not as if he made his living, prior joining congress, as an independently wealthy, Harvard educated attorney, who's specialty was going after Iraq war contractors. I'm sure you are more familiar with the law than him though.
Gunitchik (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
lol. I love Alan Grayson, always calling someone out and putting them on the spot. But, thats why you should know what you're talkin about cause the other guy didnt
yongy2000 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Jim,you're a moron of the 1st degree. Of course this is a Bill of Attainder. Singling out an org. specifically for legislative punishment without the benefit of trial is exactly what a Bill of Attainder is and therefore unconstitutional. In this case, Congress encroached upon the power of the Judiciary (an equal branch of the US govt.), by singling out an individual org. for punishment without going through the court system where evidence and effective defense would have been required.
jimmytravis (3 weeks ago)
Comment removed by author
axollot (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
You are either For the Constitution or against it. Which is it? Bills of Attainder are unconstitutional. If we are shredding the Constitution - what say you on the 2nd and 1st amendments?
jimmytravis (2 weeks ago)
Comment removed by author
axollot (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
I don't think they can name all the branches of government sadly to know what branch the Judiciary falls under. Civics is dead in America, the people have no clue.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.