The dumb atheist moron returns! (Part 1)
Uploader Comments (TruthofthePeople)
Top Comments
-
"I have yet to see ANY EVIDENCE of evolution"
That's because you're willfully ignoring it.
"the bible has THOUSANDS of predictions which have come tru"
Actually, the number is closer to zero. And no, self-fulfilling prophecies don't count.
-
@SuperSam424 99.85% of biologists accept evolution, so what are you talking about? only you are in an ignorant, the group wit no scientist. the only thing little is your brain, and i know who i am talking too, a creationist moron.
All Comments (140)
-
Thanks for bringing me back to this video after 2 months, gave me a chance to laugh at it again.
-
@aussieman332 I highly recommend digging your head out of the sand, pulling your fingers from your ears, opening your eyes, and STOP waving your ass in the air like you just don't care. Reality does not disappear simply because you refuse to look at it. If one stands on the train tracks, in the path of an on-coming train and closes their eyes, the train may become invisible to them, but, that will not prevent them from being smeared across the tracks.
-
@Blawrg It was blatantly obvious to me that this person was reading from a script... Ya, know? To be certain he didn't miss, or forget any of his points, he wished to make. Let's be glad he's a shitty actor... It shows his honesty and integrity. All an actor is, when it comes down to it, is a really good/convincing liar. No offense to the actors of the world. But, that is the job... to convince others well enough to suspend disbelief.
-
The problem I have with the bible is people cherry picking or interpreting phrases to suit their own religion, lifestyle or beliefs.
-
@gr00vi3guyz What do you even mean when you say gain in information? That doesn't really make any sense, You can have mutations in genes that cause additions or deletions of sections of the sequences. When these genes are translated into proteins, because of the changed genetic sequence, these proteins will be slightly different to the rest of the population. This has a higher chance of surviving if the protein performs its job better than the wild type. This is utterly basic biology read a book
-
wikipedia/wiki/Evidence_of_com
mon_descent First result when Evidence of evolution is searched for on Google, you obviously haven't even tried.
-
@SuperSam424 this comment made me laugh. hahahahaha.
word. where do you think the origin of life came from? just curious
gr00vi3guyz 6 months ago
@gr00vi3guyz Honestly there are theories that I personally do think are more likely than others. Abiogenesis to me is the most convincing although it is a fairly new area of science that hasn't been fully explored yet. Either way I personally believe that even though science has no current consensus in regards to the origin of life, we don't need to invoke the existence of the supernatural in order to explain what we don't understand - at least until there is evidence...
TruthofthePeople 6 months ago
i don't think he represents the creation arguement at all. and just throwing this in, natural selection isnt the same as evolution even though its labeled as evolution. when does a species change to another species from natural selection? natural selection just uses the variety that is in the animals DNA already. which leads to my second point that its hard to find cases in which DNA gains information through mutations rather then the common loss of information. that's just my opinion.
gr00vi3guyz 6 months ago
@gr00vi3guyz I don't recall saying that natural selection is the same thing as evolution although if I did, then I wish to clarify this point.
DNA does not always have to gain information in order to increase survivability. Mutations are also only one influential factor (although rather important) that can affect the variability in the genetic code between two generations of a species.
TruthofthePeople 6 months ago