Disclaimer: FundieVideoHell does not support the opinions shown in its archives. All videos are uploaded for archival purposes. Commenting is encouraged on all videos in the archive.
SEMINAR CXXXVII =/=/= From the 2009 Seattle Creation Conference. Presenter: Steven Austin
@morehate4uall What is so funny about science refuting science? That's exactly how science progresses. It was an established fact that cold fusion was silly until Andrea Rossi proved them wrong. Scientists thought flight was impossible until Wright brothers proved them wrong and other examples are almost impossible to enumerate. I don't know where you took your science classes but I suggest you upgrade your knowledge. Especially on the history of science.
mrdokma 2 months ago
Thanks for this btw, I always wanted to see how these guys argue "in the wild". Sounds like he has made a contribution to his discipline by not assuming that all geologic events occur at steady slow rates, which is great, bravo. But in science, you have to have natural explanations for phenomenon. When you get stumped you don't get to say, "and then a miracle occurs and it just is", and "oh by the way I have a handy superstition that explains the miracle". In his flood, where did the water go?.
NAVYGOLDEIGHTFOUR 5 months ago
To answer his question of naming a "stratum" which formed slowly at 3:10 of this shit-feast. I would say "The White Cliffs of Dover" which are cliffs which form part of the British coastline facing the Strait of Dover and France. This goof can't even use the proper term of stratum. Strata is the plural you retard. The cliffs of Dover took millions of years to form and then uplift. That's one example of hundreds or thousands there retard.
bigboy45454545 5 months ago