Michio Kaku on blackholes and einstein's equations deep flaw

Please help physicists develop and exploit particle accelerators like CERN's Large Hadron Collider, by contributing spare processing capacity of your home computers:
http://lhcathome.web.cern.ch/LHCathome/
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2390902,00.asp
================================================

Gravity is infinite at the center of a blackhole and time stops and there is a fundamental flaw in Einstein's theory according to Michio Kaku.

A quantum version of Einstein's theory.

Nigtmare beyond comprehension, infinity upon infinity.

Incompatible nature of Einstein's theory and quantum theory.


Name of episode: "Who's Afraid of a Black Hole?"

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• singularity
• principle
• quantum
• gravity

[BobTubeStudios]

Uhm, this is just a thought, but if the mass of the black hole is in the numerator, and the distance is in the denominator, then wouldn't that mean that the limit as the distance goes to zero would be independent of the mass, and thus every time you're zero away from ANYTHING, the gravity force would be infinity? And also, wouldn't there be a limit as to how close you can get to the black hole, as described by quantum mechanics. You can't simply state that they are in the same place.

[howlifebegan]

@BobTubeStudios I am absolutely clueless on your proposition :) From what I understand there is no such thing as gravity ...even tho the concept is perfectly normal to use. It is all the bending of space and time...

[FMAprotector]

What's the name of this show or show/episode? I have been searching for it but can't find the name of it?

[howlifebegan]

@FMAprotector Boof... I have been watching so many i dont remember which one it is... could be that one: watch?v=qeOWfYT5YJc&feature=re­lated

[FMAprotector]

@howlifebegan I finally figured out. The show is Horizon and the episode is "Who's Afraid of a Black Hole?" in case some poor soul asks this again and has to search for it....

[howlifebegan]

@FMAprotector Thank you very much! I will update the description.

[WeAreBorg359]

@howlifebegan If gravity is truly non-existent, as a force, then why is Physics continuously on the search for a force-carrier (graviton)?

[lastmondaypast1]

right when scientists get to the pearly gates, right when they are about to figure out the origin of it all, nature just looks back with a grin.

[KEDeviancesakapnayan]

@BobTubeStudios first of all, the ANYTHING part makes it absurdly impossible since you are talking about a behemoth-scaled physical object and then go small scale (which is truly awkward).. that is the reason why you apply classical physics to what you are saying.. next, no approximations had been made on how close one can get to the black hole, but theoretical positioning had been shown through equations..

[Demonfeed]

@Demonfeed If you take the center of the Big Bang and make it point (0,0) on a graph and you draw lines at all directions away from that origin originyou have 4 infinite planes filled with equal quantities of lines. But, you still have the origin. Perhaps the origin plays by different rules than the lines leaving it. And if everything expanded out in infinite directions, you could not from, say point (1,1), see point (-1,1) because some remaning force from the origin is still intact.

[Demonfeed]

When we talk mass, we are inevitably going to be forced back to the atomic level. There are positive, negative, and neutral charges present in every atom. There cannot be a number with other than 3 possibilities. Expansion cannot be infinite if the source of the expansion is not also infinite. On a Cartesian Plane, if you try to take point (1,-1),force it through (0,0) to

(-1,1) any point in time passes through it's own source, which isn't possible. Perhaps the origin is surrouned by a wall.

[Invisibrah]

You can't divide by zero! Stop the presses!