Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Bill O'Reilly on Tim Tebow and the ProLife Superbowl Ad

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,670
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 27, 2010

Bill O'Reilly and Jehmu Greene of the Women's Media Center debate Tim Tebow's prolife Superbowl ad.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • That woman should watch Maafa 21 and see what abortion is doing to the African American people. You can watch it on youtube

  • They are separate. The ad is simply a commercial and is not directly affiliated with the game.

see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If woman is raped, or the baby is 100% guaranteed to be born with a life threatening deformity/defect, I think the woman should have the choice if they want to have they baby or not. If it't just "I don't want the baby" well that is what happens when you have sex.

  • Wow let her talk man its an interview...jeez

  • If I were Tim Tebow, I bet I'd be happy to be alive, too.

    I doubt very many aborted fetuses had a chance for anything even resembling Tim Tebows life, though.

  • That Jehmoo is one ugly black woman. She needs to straighten that awful hair. I'd change my name too. Jehmoo is a hideous name

  • Pro-choice is advertised more often than Pro-life: movies, television, magazines, etc.

  • @Tranaeh No. Humans with less thought capacity than a cow who don't even suffer at the level a cow can suffer are not more deserving of legal protection than a cow. You say animals are treated better than that. You should look into that because I think you are mistaken. Check out KFC's treatment of chicken. I certainly wouldn't advocate killing even a mentally retarded human being. I'm not saying therre is a line. But, if there were it would certainly be after the first trimester.

  • So humans with less thought capacity than the average adult are okay to eliminate? Even if the means of elimination is by tearing apart their body limb by limb? Even the animals are treated better than that. I've had two sons now - and I know that their unique personalities are already developing in the womb. They respond to familiar sounds, and react to touch. I know they can feel and perceive what is going on around them to some degree.

  • @Tranaeh If a woman wants to have an abortion for whatever reason. The moral transgression is less than that of killing a cow, pig, sheep. You can argue the fetus is "Human". But, it is a human with far less thought capacity, even physical perception than the animals I listed. So, if you want to make killing these "humans" illegal you should first make it mandatory that we all become vegetarians otherwise you make it pretty obvious you have some alternate agenda.

  • @Kausidya LOL, no I don't want to force pregnancies or overpopulate the world. I think there are better ways of being a responsible world citizen than eliminating existing life in the womb. That is more violence. Countries that have taken abortion as the solution for crowding are huge human rights violators (China and forced abortion ends one life and terrorizes another). It is comparable to the atrocities committed in the slave trade - "can't feed em? throw em overboard." Its dead wrong.

  • @Tranaeh I not suggesting anyone wants violence but it seems like prolife people want to over populate the world at any cost. Even if it means forcing women to be human incubators. And if they aren't willing to be inpregnated you'd prolly force them.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more