My evidence for God and debunking atheism
Uploader Comments (WackyZ4ck)
Top Comments
-
I love it when you swear to the bible as your truth - you must flunk math so bad when you tell your math teacher that the bible proclaims that god says Pi is 3 rounded; guess you have no excuse there but your gullibility in faith ^^
Video Responses
All Comments (80)
-
*sigh* another stupid religious person on youtube.
-
Non-evidence.
-
When the Andromeda galaxy collides with the Milky Way, tearing it apart, let's see how many people talk about how perfectly tuned our universe is for life.
-
Ok, you completely failed to mention how your argument means the specific god that you believe in exists.
-
Supposition based on numerous assumptions is damn weak evidence... plausibility, denied.
-
First of all, the 7 examples can all be traced back to the first 4 so I'll just deal with those, the fundamental constants. My question is, how do you know that there wouldn't be a completely different universe constructed from different fundamental constants. You mention that protons would not be possible with the current strong force but who's to say there isn't another particle that then would be possible with mind blowing properties.
-
Instead of providing reasons why a god could or should exist, why not bring your god here and let it speak for itself?
That is the only way to "debunk" atheism. Your way is only evidence for your ignorance.
-
The universe balaced? heh gimme a break, the universe is actually tearing itself apart.
-
The first 3 minutes or so, I agree with, however, saying God evolved from creation, is insane. And Paul saying we grow into Christ did not mean that we evolve into gods. Matter of fact, that's not what the verse said at all.
-
The fine tune argument is a bad argument. Evidence seems to be pointing to an infinity of universes.The jury isn't in yet for your argument. Also, the fine tuned universe has been debunked over 20 years ago, it's not new.
yes, if things were different, then things would be different. how do you attribute this to your invisible sky daddy?
youve overlooked a few things: is this carbon based approach the only way life could form? change any of those things and youre only changing *our* ability to live.
are we just very lucky? we arnt using the whole universe to make one little spec of life. estimates put the number of stars at 10^22 to 10^24.
I dont think multiple universes have been proven either.
jwfcp 2 years ago 4
Some of these principles make such things as matter to not even be possible. This argument would not stand scrutiny
WackyZ4ck 2 years ago