Deathly Hallows - Part 2 Deleted Scene: Horcruxes Explained

In this scene at Shell Cottage, Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) discuss Bellatrix's strand of hair, Horcruxes and how Harry knows how to find them.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Harry
• Potter
• Ron
• Weasley
• Hermione
• Granger
• Dan
• Radcliffe
• Emma
• Watson
• Rupert
• Grint
• Deathly
• Hallows
• Part
• Deleted
• Scene

[chibizeru]

It would've been hilarious if Hermione turned into a cat again.

[mistaseth]

@zach2992 Scenes aren't just cut for the sake of keeping the running time down. There are many other issues, the most obvious being the pacing. Many people already complain that the beginning was clunky and too drawn out. Adding another scene (an unnecessary one at that) would have messed up the pacing even more. If they did have to include one extra scene at the beginning, I would select the one with Luna since it explains why she is all-of-a-sudden at Hogwarts later in the film.

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda Glad you rewatched. However, my last remark wasn't a compliment. But thanks for responding. I don't continue debates with 'film students'.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish yup. was a nice condo/debate we had. i actually rewatched the film to review the points you said. (: 

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda A ha! You study film....this explains so much!!

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda give up a few in this case

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish no actually im not a fan... rofl. I just wished maybe you could view the movie in the point of the director and/or editor. I study film and realize how hard the task is, especially when the consumers (viewers) are demanding alot. every cut, every remake, every change of scene is stressed out further by the fact that HP books being so big. there are many many themes, story lines and factors in the movie that sometimes the director must give up 1 to make the others work better.

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda Thanks for clarifying about the misread. However, I'm not buying the 'I'm not even a fan' argument, nor the 'you fanatic can rant...' comment either. I think you're just trying to get out of admitting you were wrong.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish I misread your last comment where you said purebloods i thought u said mudblood. my bad on that point. anyways its a movie. tbh im not even a fan of it. i only watch it cause of Emma Watson. lol. so ill leave it here. you fanatics can rant all you want but remember, its a damn movie and nearly every damn movie made has flaws in it. bad continuity or not the movie made sense, people watched it and was entertaining. I suggest you take it less seriously or make 1 your self :P

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda I didn't say that only purebloods can find it. I don't where you've got that from but I never said it.I said that even purebloods are suffering, so therefore 'Mudbloods' would definitely not be safe. No, there are two deatheaters mentioned by Neville as he brings Harry etc through the secret passage, he talks about the Carrows. I'm not talking about continuity from the books at all, it's all mentioned in the films.

[MrPizzaeatingpanda]

@fantastischfish once again you tie in the continuity from the books. The movie never suggests that only pure bloods can find the room of requirement, but to those "who seek for it" whoever that may be. secondly, the death eaters who are currently in hogwarts is..... Snape?? the rest are students who are nicely escorted to the dungeon.

[fantastischfish]

@MrPizzaeatingpanda Still not a good explanation. There are Death Eaters (Voldemort's minnions incase you'd forgotten) working at Hogwarts, so clearly Voldemort has infiltrated the school. And even pureblood wizards like Neville are hiding out in the Room of Requirement. There is just no excuse for this poor continuity.