Yesterday I annotated the December 29th forecast with a not that there was an analytical error. The forecast was based on an erroneous of the assessment of the size and depth of the coronal holes. Because of inconsistencies in the contrast curves when I changed computer displays the holes appear larger and deeper that they do on the display I've been using previously.
wow! i don't envy the person thats going to write up that program, all the variables. subduction, divergent, covergent plates. GMST. sea temps and currents, solar activity, lunar activity, this makes weather predicting look kindergarden and we have not got this down to an art yet,
i love what your trying to do, but think how much effort and computing and cost goes into predicting the weather your attempting to predict sub terrain activity. this is something a satellite cannot see.
genebeards12212012 3 years ago
1st time viewer. Amazing theory.
I've watched all your videos last night.
Looking forward to hearing about your theories more in depth.
WAHsu 3 years ago
thanks for the vid, I know the feeling of needing to get something done / shared
Re4dSetH 3 years ago
Better luck with future endeavours.
A program is a good idea, it will also give a mathmatical basis to what your seeing intuitively.
simonodell 3 years ago