Red Cliff movie review by Kenneth Turan
Top Comments
All Comments (19)
-
this review lacks depth.
-
Yeah Kenneth Turan sucks. He thinks he can be the ultimate objective critic and just be the most professional critic by offering as little opinion as possible, but the result is just fuckin 2:11 minutes of waisted time. Fuck you Turan, why don't you talk about acting, cinematography, directing, or anything relevant.
-
That sun blinding bit pisses me the FUCK off.
-
Then you aren't listening: the film, as released OUTSIDE the US, was in two parts, EACH roughly 2 1/2 hours EACH, and titled "Red Cliff I" and "Red Cliff II". The US version is an edit of the two together cut down to about half the full length of the two as uncut.
-
"Minus a few scenes"!? The US release is about HALF as long as the full two-part film, which latter is some 5 hours.
-
TURAN IS UYGUR TURKY
-
God China is so cool.
-
you people are all idiots. the US version, which came out later than the Chinese edit, is edited into one movie called "red cliff", combining "red cliff 1" and "red cliff 2", which is how the movie(s) were released in china. The US edit of red cliff is basically the two other moves combined, minus a few scenes that they were able to imply to have occurred later in the movie.
This ain't a fucking review..u kidding me??
Spec718 8 months ago 4
What happened to reviewing the movie? All I heard was a summation what Woo was involved in (a historical epic) and then that it was nice to have Woo back again. Really? What about the movie?
ComeAndLive86 1 year ago 4