EFFECTIVE Representation - "WE HAVE NOT", Mike Warnken

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,321
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 18, 2009

Exclusive O.S.T. Interview with Michael WARNKEN after rebuttal of
California's Motion to Dismiss his Federal Lawsuit to increase California State
Assembly to 12,000, thereby making the districts small enough to allow WE THE PEOPLE,
any of us to get our petitions for REDRESS answered, which currently, the people can not, and
that violates 1st Amendment for Redress of grievances. Oral arguements on Motion for dismissal/ standing to be heard in U.S. Federal Distict Court, Dept. 25, 501 "I" St. , Sacramento, Ca. 10 A.m. on Wednesday, Jan 21, 2009.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (williamwagener)

  • Update in video Response coming by Saturday.

  • Hey, I waiting to hear what happened

  • Judge did not make an immediate decision on Jan. 21, but will issue a ruling soon. Heard both sided, but incidcated he did not think the case of Warnken passed the Judiciability standard, or and did not have "Standing" so... Judge never dealt with the core issues beyond that,

    but it seemed obvious, Magistrate Brennen did NOT read the whole brief presented by WARNKEN.

  • Will video cameras be allowed in the courtroom?

  • No, I asked already. but we will do interviews of both sides from the steps.

Top Comments

  • Anyone against this movement is too screwed up and sheep like my dad. I do not care. Edmonton has over a million. There need to be a clean sweep of MP's that only get $50K to $75K max. We need to turf glultony and hang on steet light infront over their homes to make an example of them

  • Michael WARNKEN is not only a patriot, intelligent and determined, but he sure is good looking.

see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fro instance, as far as i am aware, there is no such title as SUPER LAWYER.

    So how could one be hired ?

    The courts can do whatever they want to this man, if he is prepared to use "slang" in court, and to explain what happened. He may be honest, but his words are so "loose" that he may as well say "yippeee aye ay, let the great wagins roll, on the prairie masser - yippeeee"

    Cus with such LOOSE vocabulary, ANYTHING can be done to you.

    A concrete court case, with super lawyers !

  • You see, the guy who's telling you what happened is either repeating precisely what was said, or he isnt.

    All this "concrete exposure of the facts" or "the arguement was upheld by a high fyling lawyer" (just examples of babble used in courts), is th ekind fo language, which, especially when repeated (with more non truths added in, to "funk it up"), the whole description becomes un-understandable babble.

    Americans MUST learn to speak english, and not legaleese babble, all day !!

  • I have to say, these satanists should be stopped IMMEDIATELY that they tell ANY lie - this is the ONLY way to get anywhere near the truth. When you alow one lie past, it tangles up the whole sentence and becoem GRAMMARRTIZED.

    First example:

    Whent he pig says "YOu have to put in your objection in a CONRETE way"

    STOP RIGHT THERE - CONCRETE DOES NOT COME INTO THIS COURT - IT IS A BUILDING MATERIAL.

    HE IS ALREADY AWAY FROM THE TRUTH, SO THERE IS NO WAY TO PIN HIM DOWN, AFTER THIS POINT.

  • CA has gone to heck in a handbasket. The illegal aliens have completely overtaken everything and have raped our entitlement programs. Californians are now paying the highest sales tax in the country, among other taxes just to keep entitlement programs going. I'm moving outta here as soon as I can.

    Thanks William. interesting

  • this is a nice video lol

  • wendybear666 ? whats that supposed to mean ? That you sold out to the same evil destroying this nation.....take your 666 and shove it where the sun dont shine.

    NICE WORK WILLIAM...

  • This Michael makes more sense than most politicians... How can I give it 7 stars... Thanks William

    You the man.

  • The Founders of the USA had "representation" before the King; it is just that those "representatives" were not representing the People of the Colonies.

    The absolute best representation an individual can get is to do it themselves. Being done at the local level in town meetings.

    Any project or program that get "big" enough of its own would then pass through the country, state and then into the federal realm of government supervision.

  • That is what "without representation" means, geeezzz

  • For you to think I an a "fat-cat lover" you have not read my website on the issues of reforming government.

    (dot) PortablePublishing (dot) com

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more