9/11 Un-debunked: An Answer to RKOwens4 and Other Internet Debunkers Part 1

The 9/11 Un-debunked series is a series of videos made in response to the videos posted by RKOwens4 and also to respond to the claims of other so-called 9/11 debunkers. The series does not address every subject raised by RKOwens4 in his videos, only the most important ones. The series mainly focuses on the collapse of the WTC and Building 7. The series does address the issues of the Pentagon and Flight 93 some what. Other issues are not raised simply because either the theories have no merit and have been debunked or the issue has been debated to the point where all the information has been exhausted. This video series does not endorse any "missile" or "no planes" theories. It focuses on scientific evidence based from the work of Dr. Steven Jones, Professor David Ray Griffin, Jim Hoffman, and Kevin Ryan. It is strongly encouraged to use this video series to answer any of the claims made by so-called "debunkers." Thank you for taking the time to inform yourself. I DO NOT OWN THE MUSIC OR PICTURES SHOWN IN THIS VIDEO SERIES.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• 911
• Truth
• Movement
• New
• World
• Order
• Steven
• E.
• Jones
• Richard
• Gage
• Kevin
• Ryan
• James
• Jim
• Hoffman
• David
• Ray
• Griffin
• Trade
• Center
• WTC
• Twin
• Towers
• Thermite
• Thermate
• Pentagon
• Flight
• 93

[WhyAskQuestions]

In October 2009 I wrote a blog called "9/11 Truthers Exposed". It talks about a variety of things that the Truthers and Truth Movement have discussed in the past. It also talks about the psychological aspect of Truthers and their theories.

So far in almost 2 years not a single Truther has dared to debunk the blog. All they mange to do is not read it or make ad hominems about it.

I challenge any Truther to create a blog to debunk my blog, with sources of their "evidences". Any takers?

[citizenfor911truth1]

@WhyAskQuestions

Hmm, sounds interesting. Send me a link to the blog and I'll have a look at it. However, I'll likely not address the entire thing, since there's plenty of alternative theories I don't believe in.

[1234567654321d]

 9/11 was a inside job. Anyone with half a brain who isn't blinded by patriotism can see that. But whats up with this horrible music?!?!?!?! Bad choice! Made this video unwatchable for me.

[citizenfor911truth1]

@1234567654321d

I actually had different music, but youtube made me change it to one of their songs. I know the music in some of my vids isn't the best, but I figured it's better than just watching white text on a black background.

[lumpheadthump]

as soon as you said that engineers "claimed that jet fuel melted towers of steel" you failed. No report contains those claims, so you pretty much debunked your own claims. Until you have an honest argument, you have nothing.

[citizenfor911truth1]

@lumpheadthump

Perhaps you should have read what I actually wrote. I said that after the attacks numerous engineers claimed the steel had melted, which is true: tinyurl(dot)com(slash)43opmq2

[acidthunder1]

@Spindry96 I agree- unless a proper criminal investigation is conducted with subpoena power the full truth will never be known

[Spindry96]

@acidthunder1 Psychology of deniers? l can only speak for myself. Every conspiracy theory l consider both sides and come to what l consider an informed opinion. lf that means the gov is guilty so be it. l think no evidence from either side can be treated as gospel until verified. Certainly there are way too many 9/11 theories that are simply wacky and you have to wonder at the mentality of people who blindly subscribe to many of these theories.

[acidthunder1]

@WhyAskQuestions what about the psychological aspect of deniers or coincidence theorists, have you considered that too?

[Roonoon2]

@ed11561 bitchboy lol