Secret History: Kinsey's Paedophiles (2/6)

This is a Yorkshire Television production for Channel 4, produced and directed by Tim Tate, aired August 10, 1998. The show features interviews with Kinsey team members Paul Gebhard and Clarence Tripp, Kinsey Institute director John Bancroft and several of Kinsey's biographers.

Here is an original press release of the production:
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/old/timtate.htm

Parts of this show are cited in this chapter:
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/chapter7.pdf

from Dr. Reisman's book Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences:
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2005/08/kinsey_crimes_c_1.html

Also see The Kinsey Coverup:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3704337510629412177

and The Kinsey Syndrome:
http://www.thekinseysyndrome.com/

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Alfred Kinsey
• Paul Gebhard
• Clarence Tripp
• Wardell Pomeroy
• Clyde Martin
• The Kinsey Institute
• John Bancroft
• Mr. Green
• Fritz von Balluseck
• child sexual abuse
• Children of Table 34
• Judith Reisman
• Tim Tate
• sex education
• science fraud
• human sexuality research
• documentary
• pedophilia
• paedophilia

[Dutch19474853]

On the accusations made about the intentions/agendas of those involved creating this work; any real arguments would be helpful.

Regardless, given the testimony of Kinsey's own colleagues alone, as portrayed here, isn't it clear that criminal acts were deliberately cloaked using the veil of science?

[AlphaKillaX]

this is not science, everyone that participated in this should be arrested if still alive

[TheSjpatrik]

@AlphaKillaX It's a uncommon science indeed, but the psychology behind this behaviour or sexual perversion still needed to be studied.

[FotoKadr]

sounds like jared leto to me...

[leiefilm]

scary what people get away with in the name of sience

[Ms90sforever]

They let a grown man sexually abuse a child

[jerico641]

@bobzeda

Oh, man, pedophilia laws were in place in Indiana in the 40s and 50s, and as high profile as that report was, Kinsey certainly knew that if he or his team had done anything wrong during the research, their asses were cooked. Nobody indicted anyone for anything, and believe me, some people definitely wanted to.  As for interviewing pedophiles themselves, he interviewed all sorts of different people; he had to, otherwise the results would've been invalid.

[bobzeda]

@jerico641

I think I touched on this before. By today's laws, he would be an accessory to the crime (pedophilia-related crimes). Encouragement is all it takes under the law. He also,at minimum, would get Misprision of felony . Mr King is dead.

I don't think asking a pedofile what children thought of his sexual abilities is scientific. It is biased by his warped sense of perception that the children 'want' him.Studying the children in a real scientific environment with peer review is scientific.

[jerico641]

@bobzeda

No, I'm not implying that someone didn't exist. I believe children's views on sexuality and reproduction is important and such a report would not have been valid without them. As for Indiana, the man was trying for a median cross section of America; that was entirely the point of the research. And I ask again: if something inappropriate or damaging to children was actually perpetrated by Kinsey's people, why was no one ever indicted? Apparently a lot of people "knew" something.

[bobzeda]

@jerico641

Are you implying that Rex King (Mr Green) never existed?The child chapter was not scientifically valid. It should not have been in the book.

They need to remove prisoners and prostitutes from other data sets as well. I don't like the idea of using Indiana alone for his surveying.Indiana had to be one of the most sexually repressed states in the 30's and 40's (as now:)~ Anyone willing to talk sex in Indiana in 1935 would have been a "deviate" in that state.Use New York AND Indiana.

[jerico641]

@bobzeda

Very interesting, sure; most sensationalism is. Look, he was investigating human sexuality in depth and without prejudice, in an entirely open way. That embarrassed and offended a lot of people then and still does now, only god knows why. Some of the people with whom he worked were also not fond of his style of investigation or of him personally. Let me ask you again: if there had been many episodes of molestation or other impropriety, why was no one indicted by the law?

[bobzeda]

@jerico641

Even if you LOVE Dr. Kinsey and think he could do no wrong, this video is very interesting.Three of his main researchers (and Dr. Kinsey's friends) are interviewed in depth. This isn't edited to make the men look bad. They interview the men in a very congenial way. None of them DENY any of the 'rumors.' They give their scientific reasons for what they did. The head of the institute is interviewed and he openly acknowledges the instances and also says it was for the greater good.