Crash test of a F-4 Phantom
Top Comments
All Comments (144)
-
Well spotted, you are quite right. the wing tips extended slightly beyond the sides of the concrete block so were not brought to a dead stop. They were the only recognisable parts of the plane left.
-
I can see parts that are much larger than confetti. The wing tips. :-)
-
nice work!
-
Goodbye tax dollars lol
-
This is why a Plane couldn't have crashed into the Pentagon on September 11th
-
@MomoTheBellyDancer All u witnessed and testified is ur patented stupidity, u self-deluding retard. LOL.....
-
What truly insulted u is ur own stupid belief that Pentagon got hit by an invisible plane which liquefied upon impact.
Do ur parents a favour, educate urself on what real air crash is like, see Air Crash Investigation!!! Yes, a sizeable portion of a crashed plane can be reconstructed from its debris. Real planes dun get "liquefied", moron :D
-
"U SUCK!"
Yes, personal insults. That will convince everybody you're right.
watch?v=BNsrK6P9QvI
-
"what do you think that material is?"
What "material"? To establish liquefaction occurred, u've got to NOT ONLY have liquefied remnants present, BUT ALSO they have to be in quantity large enough to make up a whole airliner. Is this simple logic still too difficult for a crocoduck like u to understand?? :P
"Most would be inside the building"
Again, u're admitting u havent seen enough liquefied remnants to prove liquefaction, u juz think they're out there. U SUCK! :D
How did the pilot not see a FREAKING WALL?!?
ieatsgoats 2 years ago 18
@baef12 I'd prefer one filled with bigots myself.
M1K3YM0 11 months ago 6