Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

HHO vs HH

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,319
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 13, 2008

There are many questions about adding Oxygen to the HHO mix. This test shows that there's not much difference but with the price of gas, every little bit helps.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (paul84838)

  • Hi guys, on reading tests done by universities on this subject, the outcome for hydrogen only in combustion, was less favourable than the hydrogen oxygen mix, and hydrogen with less than 5% of oxygen becomes {Implosive, not explosive}, so this would further cause timing related issues of a combustion engine.

    Thom in Scotland.

  • @fuelban The experiment resulted in an increase in mpg via Scan Gauge. This increase was the result of the engine free-wheeling (if you will). The aim of the test was to eliminate the use of the O2 simulator. I had problems with the simulator, in that, the mpg would return back to original after seeing an increased MPG. The reason for this was the increase in engine temperature. There are many checks that the computer does to combat a lean fuel mixture. Just figured I'd throw this at you.

  • so for this test , exactly where did you get your "hydrogen only"

  • If you watch the "No More HHO" video you'll see that a few months back I developed a separation generator.

  • Steve,

    Unfortunately the number of plates doesn't matter. The result is always a 2 to 1 ratio. Believe me, I've tried every combination.

see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hi! :]

    youtube.com/watch?v=BhmBNY19M_­0

    did you preheat Hydrogen? Propobly gonna be more efficiency if it happends...aledgedly :]

    Regards!

  • Hi Paul, just been thinking, and one thing comes to mind, there was a guy who reckoned the location of ingoing HHO, could be key to this matter, he was {If I recall correctly} putting the gas in after the sensor, or was it !!, Indeed I might have this wrong, but worth a mention, again I personally have no direct experience so… best of luck.

    Thom.

  • @paul84838 Hi Paul, thanks,…….. Though I must say I have “no experience” with this matter, as I drive an old Mercedes 190 petrol, and thankfully don’t have these sensors Paul, so its less complex for me {thankfully} LOL….. Interesting stuff though.

    Thom.

  • question if you are taking out the oxegen and you are keeping the same flow rate and it was with oxygen, then you would have more hydrogen input and a net gain in explosive gasses. not a larger net gain in efficancy. just more hh per produced volume. so yo may see a 30% decrease in the oxygen and at the same output a 30% increase in hydrogen. but you are showing a 3.8% increase only. my conclusion is you have a net loss in total efficacy with the removal of oxygen. or did you compensate?

  • i have my new hho seperation system that will allow you to use standard drycell assembly and seperate the hh and o will post the new cell layout and video soon. but for now look at my old post of an early hh and o seperation.

  • I have done this in all my cells/generator, I always have 2- and 1+ ratio, and I also put neutral plates after the last negative plates which is next to the end plates :o) Regards, Jon

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more