Paranormal blog #5: Why E. V. P.s are NOT radio waves

You might want to get some Solitaire games going, since, aside from pics from two previous investigations/videos, there isn't much to look at for a lot of the time.

Anyway, hopefully this will put the old 'E. V. P.s are just radio waves' so-called "argument" to rest, as those that say that sure did miss a lot...

Kids! See my contest offer at the end for your chance to PROVE E. V. P.s are indeed radio waves! Big bucks guaranteed for some lucky skeptic to win! (Yeah, sure.)

BTW, I know the term "radio waves" doesn't just mean the three things I outlined -- it can mean all KINDS of interference -- I just meant the common blame in regards to having voices involved. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.

(Pics are from my "E. V. Ps.: return to Beeler/huge southern cemetery" and "E. V. P.s from two cemeteries" vids.)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evp
• supernatural
• haunted
• ghosts
• paranormal

[JoGurlzStuff]

hi tommy! you make very valid points here. my very first traditional EVP was caught asking after who would have been my father-in-law (deceased). was it radio waves that said his name...Harry? hmmm...guess someone was listening in to me in my living room asking after harry. NOT! btw...welcome back! :o)

[tviscante]

Thanks for the welcome :) Yep, guess someone who knows HOW far away was listening in AND was somehow able to answer you back, along with you *somehow* magically picking up their response afterwards! Golly!

[Vegito1089]

Yeah... I MIGHT have believed it was radio waves if there wasn't for the fact that my Sound recorder was actually smacked (And my video camera too), the knockings on the wall, doors opening by themselves (And its not the wind, one time the door opened by itself before I had even put my hand on the door knob) and the random pinching on me.

I completely agree with you man.

[tviscante]

Yeah, but what you and I have experienced wasn't really the point; see the "A better explaination of VLF Radio and EVP" vid (eight minutes long though) to see what I mean. Even though it's nice to know that stuff (I didn't know about cameras and remotes causing interference), he totally missed what I outlined in regards to unexplained voices responding to questions.

If he were to go on a hunt and catch voices that sound experts can't explain, then see if he still finds that to be "silly".

[tviscante]

Yeah, as I've already said, it's good to know that stuff (I don't know much about cbs or ham radio). But even for someone tech ignorant like myself I can still come up with good points anyway: explain the voices/question response. Where are the answers to that? Even for skeptics not believing, they just need to get in our shoes, i. e. go on a ghost hunt to a place known for activity (maybe with a group), do recordings and then not be able to explain them. They have to EXPERIENCE it first.