Ravel's "Bolero" - the COMPLETE, DEFINITIVE version

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
19,437
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 29, 2011

Conducted by Paul Kletzki - ramp up the BASS!

Footnote: I first heard this piece as a small boy (many, MANY years ago) when it was being used in a TV action series as an instrument of TORTURE.

The victim was strapped to a chair wearing headphones (the victim, not the chair - keep up!) and the volume was MAXED OUT.

He was fine for the first few minutes...

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (carllafong69)

  • hm.. I often sit in a chair and listen to Bolero with headphones, quite loudly.. lol. Thanks for sharing this.  I was reading up on the piece, and read that Ravel played it slower originally as well as being quoted saying it was a seventeen minute piece. I really appreciate getting to hear a different perspective on this from the one I'm used to. Thanks.

  • @drakedt My pleasure. Ravel's Bolero is essentially a SLOW WALTZ - but since the 3/4 time is so SLOW, most arrangements concentrate on the much faster, overlaid DRUM part. RATT-A-TAT-TATT! RATT-A-TAT-TATT!!

    But Kletzki eases BACK (just a little) on the drums and emphasises that 3/4 time more (which is apparent when you can hear the BASS - hence my instruction in the info panel to RAMP IT UP!)

    THANKS for the info about Ravel saying the piece should run 17 minutes. Kletzski takes 16:49!

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @tomxchao no.Too slow.

  • this is a precise test for any orchesta... progressive and precise getting more and more complex... like assembling a clock, i dont know, but it is great. thanks for this vynil version.

  • BEAUTIFUL

  • No, the vinyl noise is BEAUTIFUL. Analog rules !!

  • I used to pretend "conduct" with my father to this record, (yes, vinyl record) when I was little, about 8 years old....a loong time ago...lol...listening to this version brought such a smile to my face,and brought back great memories of my father and I, pretending that we were conductors. Kudos..beautiful tempo. thank you.

  • legendary version with mehta is the best!

  • This is the correct tempo. 

  • Snap, Crackle, and Pop called, they want their audio fidelity back.

  • almost there with the tempo, but, it's one of the best that i've heard =)

  • @NielsC68 Absolutely. People have gotten used to it being THRASHED through in around 10 minutes or so. Someone else also remarked how Ravel himself said he composed it to run 17 minutes. (Incidentally, sorry for the delay in answering - this comment got past me. Happy New Year!)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more