Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
There is no credible scenario whereby the ocean's 1.3 billion cubic kilometers of seawater could have their pH dropped so much. There's simply not enough fossil fuel to burn.
HOW TO TALK TO A CLIMATE SKEPTIC gristmill.grist. org/skeptics
The journal Nature has an excellent library of information: nature. com/climate/index.html
There's also this website from a top British scientific academy. They provide responses to the misleading arguments "put forward by those who seek to distort and undermine the science of climate change."
1. surface warming accompanied by cooling of the stratosphere 2. warming of the lower, mid, and upper troposphere 3. warming of ocean surface waters 4. energy imbalance between incoming sunlight and outgoing infrared radiation 5. sharp and short-lived cooling of a few tenths of a degree in the event of large volcanic eruptions 6. amplification of warming trends in the Arctic region
It's easy to make predictions come true when the people doing the research are looking and hoping to find a specific finding. The most effective researcher is one who has NO interest in their field of study, then there is no risk of bias. But all these green freaks and trying their best to proof these ideas right, rather then letting data speak for itself.
To get this straight: Plants produce both. O2 during photosynthesis and CO2 during night time (when there is no sun for photosythesis). But thats not the problem. The ecosystem will change. And we won't be able adapt in this short period of time. The development is catastrophic and not long term slow motion. You may compare the situation by imaging 150 pinatubo-sized volcanoes erupting at the same time. Thats the amount of CO2 we humans are adding to the atmosphere each and every year.
Azorean is right. Photosynthesis requires O2 as well as CO2, but yields a net of more O2 after converting CO2 to sugars. At night when there is no sunlight, however, plants expire a net of CO2, but not nearly as much as they uptake during the day.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
gristmill.grist. org/skeptics
The journal Nature has an excellent library of information:
nature. com/climate/index.html
There's also this website from a top British scientific academy. They provide responses to the misleading arguments "put forward by those who seek to distort and undermine the science of climate change."
royalsociety. org/page. asp?id=6229
The models predicted:
1. surface warming accompanied by cooling of the stratosphere
2. warming of the lower, mid, and upper troposphere
3. warming of ocean surface waters
4. energy imbalance between incoming sunlight and outgoing infrared radiation
5. sharp and short-lived cooling of a few tenths of a degree in the event of large volcanic eruptions
6. amplification of warming trends in the Arctic region
All of these predictions came true.