UFO video clip from Nov 23, increased Brightness
Uploader Comments (shivercanada)
Video Responses
All Comments (35)
-
Awesome, hopefully youre into this as much as me and a few others are. We are disclosure my friend. Keep up the good work
-
Thank you! Yes it's alot of time and expense but I am compelled to keep finding out as much as I can.
These last 2 days weather has been SNOWING almost constantly.
Today a severe snowstorm with multiple highway accidents, very dangerous and no point going out as you won't see anything.
When it clears I'll be back out again.
-
I am so glad you are on this. This is a really weird situation. I am amazed some one of authority does not take more interest. Its a no fly zone for goodness sake. Keep us all posted. Happy New Year!!
-
Yes, it was a great effort but it ignored too many facts and basic physics of light diffusion, distance, reflection and the way atmospheric phenomenon like ice crystals are in reality.
Need I also say this EXACT OBJECT was reported to Mufon in JUNE 2 of this year?
No Ice crystals on a Hot day I can tell you that, especially not in the JET STREAM.
Just want to note to all my viewers a guy named YAMNI from Sweden came here to study these lights.
After I spent alot of time with him telling him EVERYTHING I knew, he ended up STEALING MY FINDINGS and claiming them as his own, then slinking back to Sweden.
Since I told the findings to other people, I have WITNESSES that he stole my findings and conclusions
He even had the NERVE to state they should name it the MELENDER PHENOMENON after him, and that he was the ONLY ONE to figure this out.
shivercanada 1 year ago
And a COUPLE points proving Yamni stole my findings.
Weather has been overcast since he was here, Showings EXTREMELY FAINT
TO see the TRIANGLE EFFECT which I TOLD HIM ABOUT, it has to be EXTREMELY BRIGHT. How could he conclude this WITHOUT SEEING IT?
The Perspective effect I came up with as well and told him, Yet with the 2 main lights now showing as long bars, HOW can one conclude this?
By STEALING my findings and slinking back home, that's how.
His own lack of evidence proves it.
shivercanada 1 year ago
UPDATE.
"1834 Niagara Falls, Canada
A square, brightly-lit object, emitting streams of light, hovered over the giant waterfall for some time."
Sound Familiar?
STREAMING LIGHTS,Just like this object!
The object itself creates the light pillar effect of streaming lights. There were not enough land light to create this effect in the early 1800's.
I have shown the lights are at different angles every time disproving land based light pillars. Possibly the SAME OBJECT from the early 1800's!
shivercanada 1 year ago
NIAGARA LIGHTS COGECO REPORT!
Check this youtube video now!
( replace the url above after the = sign with this )
9GqI3lAggN8
6:05 Freeze frame on Trevor's video when the lights converge on it, then go frame by frame as the lights pass in back of it.
You will see the spotlights get cut off by the object at the flashpoint and it looks triangular & Black.
I have captured this as well but not with this clarity, there is no doubt it's an object and at least partially triangular
shivercanada 1 year ago
If youre interested and got the time to spare out there i would recommend a good camera. Mine is no where near good but i think i'm gettin some alright footage. I need high def bad
cryinthabluze 2 years ago
Hey I already DID, I bought a NIGHT VISION ( shows nothing extra ) and an HD Camera which I used here, at least the pictures work out well.
I also bought a MOUNT for my camera for my Telescope and Spotting scope, neither had any good images.
PLEASE read the description everyone, I increased brightness and contrast, that's why it looks grainy as it was very dark out.
thanks!
shivercanada 2 years ago