Has history been tampered with? Don`t look for logic in the History of humankind!

Has history been tampered with? The documented history of human civilization is supposed to reach several millennia back into the past. And yet if we consider the rate at which civilization is supposed to have progressed, we encounter periods of obscurity and informational vacuum following the alleged decline of every ancient empire, and then everything starts anew. Inventions are presumed lost for centuries, then re-invented by people whose names bear suspicious semblance to those of the ancient inventors. Just how true all of this is? Could history as we know it really be a collation of several chronicles relating to one and the same period of time?


Apparently, this is what the Russian mathematician Anatoly Fomenko claims. He is the author of the first volume in a series of seven that came out in English recently, and generated incredible controversy amongst professional historians worldwide. Many are trying to put the author into one league with numerous paranoid conspiracy theorists and mad inventors - however, all of his work conforms to the highest academic standards and is backed by solid scientific facts; furthermore, some of the most lucid minds of our time support many of the theories put forward by the authors. Garry Kasparov, the world chess champion, says the following in his preface to volume 1:

"Let us consider the factor of a mass character that I shall be referring to as psychophysical. Documented history tells us of the insatiable need of human beings to make discoveries. The vector of technological progress is a strictly vertical one. Every ten years something happens: discoveries, sea voyages, explosions... Everything keeps on changing, we see constant evolution - from Columbus to the landing on the Moon, from crossbows to nuclear bombs. Forwards and upwards. However, the traditional ancient history tells us of periods when humanity apparently remained dormant for centuries - "ancient" Egypt, the mediaeval "Dark Ages" - whole epochs of utter stasis in human thinking. It appears that the inhabitants of ancient Egypt and Rome had a different genetic code, and couldn't be bothered about anything at all, so they froze in their development, the result being a total lack of innovative activity. At the same time, there had been prosperous ancient empires where those among homo sapiens who possessed penchants for arts and sciences could get plenty of opportunities for growth and development. But, alas and alack, all of the prosperous "ancient" empires had ceased their development at some point."

"History: Fiction or Science?" - Challenge to traditional history.

Is it possible that Ancient Rome, Greece and Egypt were invented during Renaissance? Can it be that Jesus Christ was born in 1053 AD and crucified in 1086 AD? Scientific research points to the evidence that many modern beliefs of traditional history are a sham.

"History: Fiction or Science?" by the eminent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues crowns 30 years of meticulous and extensive research. It is the first volume in seven comprising a "Chronology" that exposes numerous questionable notions of traditional history.

"History: Fiction or Science?" describes how the contemporary chronological scale was created and by whom, with the culprits named as the 16th 17th century clergy. The well-known model of history has enjoyed the relentless attention of prominent critics ever since its creation including respected people like Sir Isaac Newton and Jean Hardouin, the court librarian of Louis XIV, the Sun King of France.

Anatoly Fomenko dissects every historical age scrupulously and analyzes the data from every angle imaginable. Roman and Egyptian chronology take a good beating. Poggio Bracciolini and Petrarch take the blame for creating the beautiful legend of a mythical Classical age that never was.

The Biblical events are brought a lot closer to us both historically and geographically. The Biblical Jerusalem is actually the medieval city of Constantinople. The New and the Old Testament swap their positions in chronological order and are shown to refer to medieval events.

Using astronomy and statistics to back his theories, Fomenko delivers an abundant astronomical proof showing that the identified dates of 'ancient' eclipses are blatantly untrue. Fomenko explains the confusion between the Antiquity and the Middle Ages, and how the division between the two is merely imaginary. The book contains in-depth descriptions of the research methods used as well as the most meticulous rendition of the global chronological map with its numerous errors and glitches explained in a very level-headed manner. One doesn't have to be a mathematician to comprehend Fomenko's presentation.

"History: Fiction or Science?" transforms history from fiction into a rocket science. It is a must read for everyone who isn't entirely indifferent to human history and possibly also for those who are.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• greece
• egypt
• jesus
• caesar
• bible
• gospel
• judas
• dan
• brown
• da
• vinci
• channel
• today
• pyramid
• cleopatra
• nefertiti
• pharaoh
• moses
• story
• gnostic
• conspiracy
• masonic
• historical
• cabal
• war
• campaign
• biblical
• medieval
• china
• india
• burma
• jerusalem
• illuminati
• timeline
• english
• french
• roman
• battle
• fight
• priam
• hector
• troy
• logic

[fruitycute]

oh, come on. Look at some of the things theyre saying!! If ancient relics were created at a date thousands of years later, modern archaeological scans would be able to see right through to the real age....and besides, why would people in ancient greece decide to just go to egypt, dig really deep, and make "fake" egyptian tomes?? really!

[mithec]

nothing before viii cy. zilch. zero. google 'fomenko new chronology'

[mithec]

archaelogical scan is unknoown to science..

[mithec]

IMHO: google>books>fomenko look at TOC and comment

[mithec]

Great Wall of China as a military defense is non-sensical. It was actually built in mid 17th cy to mark the border between Great Tartary and China. You will not find this wall on earlier maps. `Mongol` nomadic tribes were small and scattered before 19th cy, in fact they even did not even know they were touted as great conquerors.

[mithec]

Chinese history is inevitably bound to get both more ancient and more eventful, proportionally to the growing involvement of China in the world affairs. Chinese historians will keep on finding valid proof of prehistoric Chinese spaceflights until the Politburo orders them to shut up.

[elysium76]

Is this serious? What? Some mass histoical conspiracy concocted by the lizard kings?

[goughy360]

Never let mathematicians study history. Your not a historian and you do not understand anything about the past if you think you can use maths to understand it

[batavianism]

PROBABLY A LOAD OF TOSH.... WE HAVE INFORMATIONAL VACCUUMS IN OUR OWN DAYS - WAR AND DESTRUCTION BEING ONE SUCH CAUSE....

[goku12345sfa3]

thought this may be intresting. what a let down.

[effeilensucre]

I see a conspiracy to sell a book, here.

[moep]

@jabaaes of course not! it's all fake. like pompeii or athens!

[jabaaes]

@420alldayy yeah i beleive in order for us to go beyond this time we need more science and no religion or its ganna bring us back down to cave men or end of us all like what bush reason for war

[jabaaes]

@moep dont say that rome is real!!!

[jabaaes]

@fudgeloopkoi i beleive the mongols were russia makes sense

[jabaaes]

@waxlyricalman yeah i agree just change every thibg to that time factions and it would make sense

[jabaaes]

if this is true about rome and egyt and greece im ganna kill myself

[waxlyricalman]

This book is so real. History is written by those who want to control the future. Read Lord of the Rings too. That is a true account of what happened in E. Europe between 1232 and 1455. Fact.