Creationists: Put Up or Shut Up

You claim to have the evidence. Well its time you put up. Science has over 240,000 peer-reviewed articles supporting evolution. Surely one of your arguments could pass. And don't posit conspiracy, claiming all scientists are god hating atheists as we all know science is a religiously diverse group.

Once Ive received an article that meets the qualifications set forth in the video I will link to it here:

To download this video copyright free please go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?izmmfmtcgum

Why Answers Research Journal does not count as a valid peer-reviewed journal. In their own words they admit they are a biased publication, and therefore, they lack objectivity and credibility. Here are their own words:

The following criteria will be used in judging papers: 1. Is the papers topic important to the development of the Creation and Flood model?... 3. Is this paper formulated within a young-earth, young-universe framework? 4. If the paper discusses claimed evidence for an old earth and/or universe, does this paper offer a very constructively positive criticism and provide a possible young-earth, young-universe alternative?... The editor-in-chief will not be afraid to reject a paper if it does not properly satisfy the above criteria or it conflicts with the best interests of AiG as judged by its biblical stand and goals outlined in its statement of faith.

If you wish to translate the subtitles you can download them from:
http://www.mediafire.com/?tnaeklh2eyz
Then send me a link to them and I'll add them to the video.


And remember to always, Think about it.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolution
• Intelligent
• Design
• Creation
• God
• Religion
• Faith
• Logic
• Reason
• Evidence
• Facts
• Observation
• Peer
• Review
• Publish
• Article
• Answers
• Genesis
• Museum
• cdk007
• Think
• About
• It

[paramattic70]

@d3ltadrive the bible isn't supposed to be taken literally??? It's only the foundation of Christianity. The cause of wars and millions of deaths. Only the word of God. Only God's infallible law. Only the book that every Christian turns to for every argument, question or belief. Sorry, I'm not gonna buy that crap you're selling. If you are saying that, you might as well finish off the deed and become Atheist. It's ok, you won't get struck by lightning.

[MrFungus420]

@YHWHisSovereign Sorry, but we have witnessed evolution. We have witnessed the evolution of new behaviors, new capabilities, new morphological structures and new species.

It's that simple.

[bary1234]

This was awesome :) They cant respond, since all they have is lies. Thank you for this, this video should go viral!

[thybigballs]

@YHWHisSovereign I'll attempt to explain in super simple terms what exactly micro and macro evolution so that maybe you will no longer be confused. Micro evolution is a small change(s) and macro evolution is many micro changes combined over a longer period. Perhaps creationists are confused by this simple concept because they routinely redefine what the word "kind" means. Does an orderly creator automatically mean a god? Your god? An anthropomorphic being that craves burnt offerings?

[d3ltadrive]

creationism and evolution dont reject each other. the bible never actual states how the world was made or how long ago, it only states that God made it. creation happened about 12000 years ago and it was the creation of mans spirit, of Gods chosen people. the bible is not meant to be taken literally, it is symbolic because everything is meant to have several meanings and several truths.

[SFGadFly]

@YHWHisSovereign How many logic classes have you taken? I ask because logic students don't usually approach it so flippantly. Logic is a human achievement borne from ancient Greek philosophers who developed a systematic + dispassionate way of examination to keep personal biases and opinions at bay. Those who deride it as less than one's [naturally] superior opinion are often at the losing end. Key differences: micro/macro = time span. Morality/ethic = an evolutionary values for survival.

[thybigballs]

Thanks. You said evolutionists are sophomoric because they refuse to distinguish between micro and macro but then you say they use "variation (micro)" to show how "reptiles evolved from fish(macro)". Have they not just defined it then? In other words, they implied that many, many, small changes eventually total up to be considered one big one. Perhaps, if the word "kind" wasn't shifted about, things could be comprehended better by both sides.

[YHWHisSovereign]

@thybigballs A good example of a sophomoric response is with the subject of macro/micro evolution. Evolutionists refuse to distinguish between the two, but anyone can see the great leap from variation within kind to transforming into another kind. They use the fact that variation (mircro) occurs to "prove" that reptiles evolved from fish (macro). Has uniformity of nature been proved from the evolution model? No, but evolutionists assume it even though it can only come from an orderly creator.

[thybigballs]

@YHWHisSovereign I sorry, I had asked for an example for the following statement of yours: "Creationists present an argument, and then the evolutionist comes up with a sophomoric response". I didn't quite ask where the logic came from.

[YHWHisSovereign]

@thybigballs Logic is the nature of reality. Where does it come from? From an evolutionary standpoint, it came by chance. From a Christian perspective, God is reality, and logic is the nature of God. We can account for the existence of logic, which is universal, immaterial, and invariable because these are the same attributes of God. Objective morality can only be defined with respect to God. Science is incapable of determining morality,and society is incapable of determining objective morality