National Anthem at Boston Tea Party! April 15, 2009
Uploader Comments (BruceFenton)
Top Comments
-
Look at the extremists and their violent songs of battle. They must be planning an armed inserection. Guess who I am....
Janet Napolitano- Dept. of Justice
-
Awesome turnout!!! But let's remember to take our hats off during the Anthem guys. :)
Taxed Enough Already!!
All Comments (29)
-
Surely Boston aren't a bunch of Tea Baggers!?
-
@BruceFenton nonsense. you prevaricate DC's lack of representation. you PERCEIVE congress to not represent the people. DC has a greater population than Wyoming, and those people have no congressional representation- this is FACT. Don't conflate your perceptions with the facts.
you purport 85% of americans were against President Bush's bailout. how many of those people knew its structure and the actual cost the American taxpayer? in all likelihood, most knew little of TARP.
-
this wasn't what I was looking for.. but it touches me hear my national anthem sung so proudly in masses... amazing.
-
What no red coats !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
singing wrong anthem....God save the Queen...LOL
Enjoy your independance
-
I'll bet this drive the liberals crazy!!!
-
wow, they so resemble the Uber-Patriotic Nazi Brown Shirts in Germany 1920's.
-
The Tea Party, despite what its de facto leaders like Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann and Newt Gingrich would like us to believe, is but a very small, fringe mob of hatemongers. Poor Gingrich only had 500 'Baggers to preach to at the Austin, Texas Tea Party rally Thursday. In Manhattan, only about 700 protesters showed up. At their big D.C. rally, about 5000 attended. Hardly a "tsunami of conservatism," as Tea Party candidate Sharron Angle boasted to protesters at her Nevada rally.
-
pure nationalism! GO TEA PARTY!!!!!
-
great!
"We deserve better"? I appreciate the spirit, but the tea parties don't make sense historically. They aren't protesting "no taxation without representation"... except DC, which should totally protest that (can you believe that their Representative does not get to vote?)!
hahayouarefunny 2 years ago
depends on whether you believe that Congress is representing the taxpayer- some argue that just because they have a Rep in Congress does not mean that they are being represented -- the argument is that, with 85% of Americans against the bailout it was still given....why? because of representation of the taxpayer or because Congress wanted to help the beneficiaries of the bailout, the major executives of large investment firms..... that's the question
BruceFenton 2 years ago