Seriously? This is your response? A spelling mistake? Folks, this is called an Ad hominem, it basically means that the speaker has nothing meaningful to say to the issues at hand. In the real world where ideas are what matter this gent's got nothing. But I'm sure you all already "realise" that, right? Surely you all "realise" it. (Oh sweet irony.) RoS1, since you're so keen on bothering with English, surely you also "realise" that your " ' " key is broken. Better luck next time!
I like "actual science". Its great. It tells us that many flying objects are "unidentified". This doesnt need to be "fun" or "mysticism land". It just means some flying objects are not always identified. In theory, I believe that is possible.
People bothering with actual science (the term you're looking for is archeologist, not historian) are quite versed in the history of Stonehenge. Crop circles are less mysterious than fences and golf courses, given they are easier reproduced. I'm happy to point out that people who actually do real science have known the secrets of these "mysterious" (cough) topics for many years. Of course reality may not seem like as much fun as UFO & mysticism land, but it does actually get things accomplished.
I dont belive every thing i hear on the internet but apparently on November 27-28 a government official is going to tell us about aliens, and a possible alien craft landing.
Thats what i heard. Besides it would be sweet to have high tech technology :)
Static Electricity buildup in the blades. some reports said the lights were linked with tentacles and there was a "Bang like thunder" just like arcing electricity. if it was explosively discharged, it wooud destroy the blade. static buildup caused a helicopter to crash as one of it's tail blades exploded
ICE: unlikely to do that much damage
UFO: possibly, it sees to be the only explanation so far, but my above thory is more likely
After watching one of the videos of mechanical failure I'd lean towards that theory. Still doesn't explain the UFO pictures...but the ones I saw did look a lot like the sun shining through clouds, lol.
Seriously? This is your response? A spelling mistake? Folks, this is called an Ad hominem, it basically means that the speaker has nothing meaningful to say to the issues at hand. In the real world where ideas are what matter this gent's got nothing. But I'm sure you all already "realise" that, right? Surely you all "realise" it. (Oh sweet irony.) RoS1, since you're so keen on bothering with English, surely you also "realise" that your " ' " key is broken. Better luck next time!
FairCogent 2 years ago
I like "actual science". Its great. It tells us that many flying objects are "unidentified". This doesnt need to be "fun" or "mysticism land". It just means some flying objects are not always identified. In theory, I believe that is possible.
RevengeofShinobi1 2 years ago
People bothering with actual science (the term you're looking for is archeologist, not historian) are quite versed in the history of Stonehenge. Crop circles are less mysterious than fences and golf courses, given they are easier reproduced. I'm happy to point out that people who actually do real science have known the secrets of these "mysterious" (cough) topics for many years. Of course reality may not seem like as much fun as UFO & mysticism land, but it does actually get things accomplished.
FairCogent 2 years ago
I believe it , becouse day befor this sabotage i had a discution about aliens .
manvis00 2 years ago
I dont belive every thing i hear on the internet but apparently on November 27-28 a government official is going to tell us about aliens, and a possible alien craft landing.
Thats what i heard. Besides it would be sweet to have high tech technology :)
ndogg7618 2 years ago
6 months or less? how come?
DrLight9 2 years ago
Can't explain Stonehenge or crop circles? Oh boy. this is starting off REALLY well.
What's more likely, a feathering blade failure/ice destroyed this turbine, or some UFO (which we didn't see) hit it?
Good grief.
FairCogent 3 years ago
oh fuck, its elvis
blacky777 3 years ago
My Theroies:
Static Electricity buildup in the blades. some reports said the lights were linked with tentacles and there was a "Bang like thunder" just like arcing electricity. if it was explosively discharged, it wooud destroy the blade. static buildup caused a helicopter to crash as one of it's tail blades exploded
ICE: unlikely to do that much damage
UFO: possibly, it sees to be the only explanation so far, but my above thory is more likely
05u16hep 3 years ago
Lol, every days a school day.
After watching one of the videos of mechanical failure I'd lean towards that theory. Still doesn't explain the UFO pictures...but the ones I saw did look a lot like the sun shining through clouds, lol.
FuManBoobs 3 years ago