Intelligent Design Experiments

Practical Side of Intelligent Design

The 'Evolution' discriminating 'Intelligent Design' is about the ideology of righteousness and for who serves its purpose in terms of institutions and control of technology. By imposing the need to suppress to whoever is going to take the view points.

The ideas being thrown around are of Intelligent Design is that of religious creationist coming from the followers of Darwinism or that of a science conscience to liberalism, or just an alternative esoteric knowledge.

It is really of no significance to results and to the applications of knowledge derived from taking either approach of Evolution and Intelligent Design which is the most important thing.

What this politicising does is just hampering progress and further advancement of science to serve the better of mankind.

What is the big deal of following the evidence and supporting such science? Why not just harness the knowledge that can be taken from this approach rather than not give it a chance at all.

There are some scientists that abstain to say that they are using the 'Intelligent Design' concept or not divulging that it is the source being use in nanotechnology and genetic engineering as both fields of sciences are doing collaborations (like stem cells research) ranging from reprogramming genes and replacing organism, cells and organs; creating biochemical materials and etch.

Say when a cell or tissue is being repaired involving micro surgery machine principle is use, in resetting the pre-programming of the memory cell the DNA information language would be require, replacing genes involves biochemical materials and etch; everything in microscopic world working as networks of CAD-CAMS.

The modeling of computer programming languages, chemical fusions, machines, motor and engines designs are clearer and precise as one can see to its application with this approach.

The more scientist knows how to efficient and effectively use this sciences the better and more lives they can save and have.

Cheers

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Intelligent
• Design
• Experiments

[mookiewak]

This video is another utterly weak claim about the applications of Intelligent Design. I saw no experiments here.

Where are the experiments to actually test for intelligent design?

[aarlin81]

Duh we can't explain it so let's make an argument from ignorance and say it must have been designed. Don't forget the false dichotomy too.

Go where the data leads us? Nah ignorance again.

Now let's make up an analogy that breaks down easily. We'll try to show that complexity requires a designer. Just leave out that we know these no biological system were designed, have evidence and can prove it rather than inferring it based on ignorance.

Same repackaged arguments with some crappy CGI.

[DunateoRom8v37]

As a Christian which support the creationism. I also feel that this is a weak video.

God's glory can be demonstrated far better.

to whom that posted this, i am just giving my honest feedback.

Keep on sharing the truth

[jouc12]

@mookiewak Can you give any applications of evolution?

[cpurmal]

I don't see anybody approving grants for these "experiments." Nor do I see any methods that they are going to use. ID belongs in a philosophy class, let science remain pure.

[synsei1]

Sorry, but nothing at all in this vid points to the necessity of a Designer, except of course when the designer is a human scientist. I can draw a circle or a hexagon on purpose, that's design; that doesn't mean that a hexagonal or circular natural structure has to be designed too.

[circusOFprecision]

@baronblod2003

can it be improved? of course...

but it got here without our ideas just fine by itself

[circusOFprecision]

@baronblod2003

the human body is a formation that is becoming, because it is the embodiment of being

it has to cope with numerous factors in within a synergistic framework in order to maintain a survivable form

if you are against the idea that it was intelligently constructed, than you have no grounds to say that it is badly constructed, it makes no sense to critique something on an engineering level if you don't even believe it was engineered...

[baronblod2003]

The human body is badly constructed. So many errors, so many bottlenecks. To even try to say it's perfect and well made is stupid. We're still changing and have been for billions of years. If god exists he didn't do a good job.

[TheFifthApes]

"We can't explain these systems by natural law"

Maybe you can't, but Kennith Miller and every other biologist on the planet can.

Sounds like you need to read a biology book Mr. Narrator.

[mookiewak]

Even if it's Billy Bob McDumbass an his new fangled "road kill pokin' stick" we have to call that INTELLIGENT too.

Obviously we have to lower the standards or God would be out on his cosmic ass for designing things like the eye the way it is.

[Bueller007]

So let me get this straight. Any time humans design anything now, we have to call it an application of ID?