Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Health Care Stakeholder Discussion: Advanced Models of Primary Care

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,254
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Aug 11, 2009

Director of White House Office of Health Reform Nancy-Ann DeParle hosts a stakeholder discussion on the potential impact of advanced models of primary care. A roundtable of industry leaders discuss identifying opportunities to strengthen our primary care system so that we can lower costs, improve quality, and increase patient satisfaction. August 10, 2009. (Public Domain)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

Download this video

Public Domain.

High-quality MP4 Learn more

  • likes, 25 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • You know, its very sad that considering how important of an issue this is, there isn't more of a discussion about the content of this forum in the comments. A little constructive criticism or some thoughtful suggestions would be nice.

  • I really hope the white house will actually listen to these guys. The family docs are the ones on the front line trenches of health care, dealing most directly with the healthcare problem. They have the greatest opportunity to both improve healthcare quality and cost - if they're actually listened to. I'll pay for healthcare integration, because in the end it'll be cheaper than what's going on right now...

see all

All Comments (142)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Proabortionists have no business running "health care."

  • This is ILLEGAL!!... The gov can not force us or order us to take on gov ran health or any other care system.. IT IS ILLEGAL!!.. Also the "medical" panel will ask for "ALL" tax returns from the IRS (FACT) so they can see how much you need to pay and maybe a little more for those who can afford a lot (Socialism). And then don't forget the ACORN'S who want to spreed the wealth around...

  • tried to link to the Holocaust in a cheap attempt to construct a "valid" point.

  • You have provided no support for what you have proclaimed to be fact, just baseless claims. If you want my sources, then I'll give you the ones I use most regularly (Internet sources, so EVERYONE can see them; books are a cheap copout for this type of debate):

    USHMM[dot]org

    holocaust[dot]about[dot]com

    remember[dot]org

    jewishvirtuallibrary[dot]org

    holocaust[dot]trc[dot]org

    Indeed the Nazis were wrong, and I'm not defending them. Nobody is. I'm simply defending Bismarck's near UHC plan which you

  • Where have I made a pro-Nazi comment? I haven't. If you think I have, then prove it. You made the assertion, you back it with proof.

    With that said, I do not censor my viewers like you do. If they support National Socialism, that's fine by me. If they don't, that's also fine. Now I know free speech can be a hard thing for you personally when it comes into conflict with your views, but I on the otherhand like to give everyone a fair say- whether I agree or disagree.

  • "Recognized" lol. I've only got like 3 videos about World War II; the rest are about World War I. The simple fact of the matter is you don't know a damn thing about history, despite your persistence that you do, and you don't know a damn thing about me.

    I didn't change the subject. I made a comparison. Do you know the definition of the term?

    I've set the record straight about the facts, because you were the one who was misrepresenting and distorting them in the first place. Someone had to.

  • You sure got your panties in a wad over being recognized for the views you've expressed. I wasn't talking about other people's posts, creationism, or any of the topics you've tried to change the subject to. You've denied basic facts that everyone knows were elements of The Holocaust. Having viewed some of your pro-Nazi comments, I now understand why you deny major aspects of The Holocaust. I've provided support for the facts I've mentioned. The Nazis were wrong, and you're wrong to defend them.

  • Finally, I really don't care anymore if you remain blissfully but arrogantly ignorant of the facts. It's really quite amusing- your persistence. So continue. I will get a chance to keep on laughing. But as far as debate is concerned, we're done. You can't back your position anymore, you haven't justified it in the first place and show no intention of ever doing so, and you lack the knowledge to do so in the first place.

    I'm done now.

  • With that said, you are unwilling to listen to what others have to say- especially if what they say goes against what you think. You're probably one of the most arrogant and half-assed people I've ever come into contact with here on YouTube, and you're a painfully laughable excuse for a debater, let alone a historian.

    With that said, you have given me a good laugh over the past week here with your "knowledge" that constitutes the quality and accuracy of a Wikipedia article lol.

  • I keep the comments they post because I'm not a fascist like you. Because I think they have every right to say what they want about Hitler and Nazism, be it for or against. I think they have every right to speak freely, regardless of my disagreements or agreements.

    Furthermore, one can easily infer from the variety of your videos that you have no interest in history, you are a very strong Republican (not to mention Conservative), and you have no respect for anything not American.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more