Who is this man? 9-11 official story started minutes after.

I have wanted to know who this man was since the beginning. Perhaps some journalist is out there who knows? Maybe someone with facial recognition links to our databases?

This "Harley Davidson" guy as I call him has been a mystery for quite a while.

It is quite obvious this guy is some kind of plant, but by who? FBI, CIA, CFR, or news media trying to make hype?

Perhaps he is employed by Silverstein. Can the We Are Change team help out?

"...come out of nowhere and just ream right into the side of the twin tower, exploding through the other side...and then I witnessed both towers collapse, one first then the second, mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense".

http://www.911blogger.com/node/9045

http://www.911blogger.com/node/6467

http://www.slate.com/?id=2074678

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/saudi.html

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9-11
• official
• story
• harley
• davidson
• guy
• mysteries

[falcon6073]

@ImagesByDavid

This man has been identified.

It's "Psycho Mark" Walsh formerly of the Opie and Anthony Show.

He worked as a cameraman for Fox News in 2001.

He spoke about what he witnessed on the O & A show on 9/12/2001.

/watch?v=8iKhV68qPt0

[getbo]

And then Mark Walsh volunteers the REASON for the collapse WITHOUT being asked, "mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense". But no high-rise had ever collapsed in history due to fire until three did that day.

Freelancer Mark Walsh planted an image on live TV into people's minds of what caused the unprecedented collapses that day at a time when everyone was wondering what happened. Could this be the handywork of Rupert Murdoch who is proud of his ability to spin?

[Sandberg1972]

@chaboyle Those last two questions you should be able to answer by now, don't u think?

Killing our own has been used as a means to wage war (for profit, more land, more influence, more wealth) many times before in our "beloved" human past.

If u know any physics, u should know that NIST's reports on the total destruction of these 3 buildings are a bunch of bollocks. Rated 5 stars for volume, but also for unscientific and fraudulent content.

BTW, ever heard of the term "compartmentalization"?

[placidDUNDAS]

@chaboyle All I'm doing is asking questions.  Questions are never illogical. What exactly is the proof against Al-Qaeda? What is the forensic evidence gathered from the scene? What scientific explanation has been offered for the destruction of 3 modern buildings via simultaneous global collapse through the path of most resistance? Why can't FEMA or NIST provide answers? How are we meant to account for the opportunistic turn government policy took immediately after the event?

[placidDUNDAS]

@chaboyle I can't speak to how many Muslims hate the west. I would guess alot.  Then again, alot of Muslims, particularly Arab ones hate Hamas too. I would expect some of that hatred to bear itself out as terror, in fact I have no trouble imagining Bin Laden and his crew hatching a scheme exactly like 9/11. I also have no trouble imagining the vanguard of global capital pulling the exact same stunt. Events immediately after 9/11 told as much of the story as the day itself.

[chaboyle]

@placidDUNDAS

You have a right to your opinion, twisted and devoid of logic as it may be. However your post does not invalidate mine made above. You provide possible nefarious motive but no proof. The evidence still points to AQ. And AQ and those who espouse their evil ideology are still blowing shit up all over the globe.

[placidDUNDAS]

@chaboyle if you find out who benefits you find out who perpetrated. I didn't think the beneficiaries of 9/11 were hard to spot. Western energy security, the isolation and containment of china, the creation of 2 strongholds against the influence of Iran, all actions beneficial to one side of the globe. I can't name names, but from where i sit, 9/11 only served to further the western agenda.

[teerexness]

@placidDUNDAS, it's amazing isn't it? I think anyone who knows enough about history to understand that TV isn't the place for it, doesn't have much difficulty believing the 9/11 was an inside (bankster) job.

[chaboyle]

@placid

Besides, those who tried it in '93 already took 'credit' for it, and still foam at the mouth with hatred for us. Billions of Muslims all over the globe. Probably 25% of them hate us, and 1% of those enough to put that hate into action. That's likely well over a half a million jihadi nutters. Now doesn't that seem more plausible then thousands of Americans conspiring to murder thousands of other Americans, with all of them able to keep quiet about it for over ten years?

[chaboyle]

@placidDUNDAS

Yeah but I want to know who did it and how they benefited. I'll give you the Sports. NBA games and Totals are rigged on a nightly basis. But that's because the players can easily get away with winning by 7 when they're favored by 10. 9/11 is much much more ludicrous. Killing our own? What for?

[placidDUNDAS]

@chaboyle

the great depression, pearl harbour, the gulf of tonkin incident, the assassination of JFK, the suez crisis, iran-contra, the 1991 invasion and subsequent enclosure of iraq, the 2003 invasion and occupation of iraq, the bailout, the 1993 campbell conference finals...all examples of shadowy agents pulling something off to nefarious benefit