Transitional Fossils in Evolution pt. 2 of 4
Uploader Comments (flyingscience)
All Comments (161)
-
@DjDedan You're right. We're wasting our time arguing with creationists. If they were capable of understanding reason, they wouldn't be creationists.
-
honestly i feel we spend way too much time and energy arguing with creationist and other anti-intellectuals.. it doesn't matter what they think,... science has proven itself time and time again, just look around your room (or straight ahead - proof abounds) - why must we waste time defending the scientific method when the proof is ALL AROUND US... the world is round and they can believe it's flat all they want, but the rest of us want to explore this world!
-
@Aheadstix85 Why are you conflating evolution with abiogenesis? Evolution is the theory of how living creatures diversify over time via descent with modification. Evolution is not about how life BEGAN. Even if you managed to disprove abiogenesis, it wouldn't disprove evolution. It would just prove that we don't know how life began (which, given that abiogenesis is still a developing hypothesis, we already KNOW we don't know). We do however, know that life evolves, and how.
OKay, so care to explain the scientific evidence i sent you?, life cannot form underwater from chemicals, they are dispersed, they donot combine, thats bilogical fact!, 1 life has never been proven to arise from non living materials or dead, to say they do is not science, but sheer assumption, on observation protein forms outside the cell, proving that humans have always been humans, dogs always dogs, i can give you so much more evidence.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 Chemicals combine by themselves to make the building blocks key ingredients of life . The early earth had trillions of chemical reactions per second occuring in the oceans , eventuly life got it right and we are here . Just do a cursory read on the subject stop making creationist look so bad .
flyingscience 1 year ago 3
@Aheadstix85 I'm blocking you because you are incapable of learning, reading and it takes up too much of my time to set you on the right path .I cant volunter to be your tutor daily and I cant ignore your posts either .To learn science takes a great effort you have to want to improve yourself .God speed on your journey of seeking science literacy . Education can change you forever if you seek it out .
flyingscience 1 year ago 2
! billion years ago?, how can that be correct when its fact that 90% of all dating methods give a date less than 1 billion years?, evolution is guess work and a crock of shit!, i have all the evidence i need to shut you down!, i have proven to you that abiogenetics is a lie, what more do you need!, stop lying to yourself, there must be a creator, something cannot come from nothing!, thats fact, deal with it!. no wonder evolutionists separate themselfs from biologists, it proves them wrong.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 You are rehashing the same old argument in a poor manner . Most top rocks are young old ones are hard to find but they have been found . Your arguments are pathetic because you are underinformed .Your last sentance is goofy and inane .
flyingscience 1 year ago 2
Haha, i like the way you ignore the dead fact of abiogensis being wrong, that information i gave you was from yet another non atheistic non religious person, that proves evolution completely wrong, life cannot come for dead nor non living materials, biologists know this, its fact, that proves abiogensis pseudo-science.
Aheadstix85 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85 Are handicaped by being a creationist ? Please read up on life from non life . Weather God zaped chemicals with a miracle or nature did it on its own it happened and the earliest life was simple cells .Evolution happened to their off spring . Life takes in non life (water) and makes it part of your biology daily , life non /life is always in flux by this interchange . You diont understand the basics to get this . The chemicals ingredients for life form all the time by themeseves.
flyingscience 1 year ago 3