Confused Islamic Scholars!

Both Zakir Naik and Yusuf Estes have peculiarly contrasting opinions about what the Quran says in regards to the Big Bang theory and the creation of the universe...

Yusuf Estes believes the Big Bang theory to be complete nonsense as explosions create chaos and the universe is too orderly. Zakir Naik on the other hand has somehow inserted the Big Bang theory into the Quran!

This really begs the question that how can two preachers of the same religion be so confused about an issue that both claim to have been 'clearly' explained in their holy book!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Islam
• BigBang
• Zakir
• Naik
• Yusuf
• Estes
• Science
• Creation
• Comedy

[yaqubali]

the pt. is if there is a random explosion as atheists believe then there wouldn't be order. but if there is a god behind it or as they like to call it "intelligent design" then they can orchestrate an explosion to bring about order. an example could be rockets there are explosions happening to provide thrust but if it wasn't well orchestrated it could blow the rocket to pieces.

[kakamana1000]

@yaqubali

Big Bang was NOT an explosion!

[yaqubali]

@kakamana1000 idk what you think the big bang is but its best described as an explosion instead of an implosion??

[kakamana1000]

@yaqubali

Its irrelevant what 'you' and 'I' think what the Big Bang is or isn't! You see science is not subjective but rather objective...! It was neither an explosion nor an implosion if you care to study the actual theory! Its difficult to summarize in a few words but suffice to say it was an expansion of space and time...!

[yaqubali]

@kakamana1000 well u didn't get my pt. i said in simple terms the perfect word for it is an explosion. but to describe it as an expansion wouldn't be a better word b/c what are u expanding space was created after the big bang.

[kakamana1000]

@yaqubali

Even in simple terms the perfect word for Big Bang is not explosion. That would be a misrepresentation and directly leads on to erroneous assertions as you have been making!

[yaqubali]

@stylezofom i don't know about your interpretation of the big bang theory but everything was together at a singularity before they parted. now the Quran is not a science book but book of signs. so how do you make a book that can be understand 1400 yrs ago and can also be understood today. if it mentioned prime nebula 1400yrs ago then it wouldn't make sense to ppl.

[yaqubali]

@kakamana1000 gravity is a fact. but our interpretation of it does change indeed so i must disagree with u. before we had newton's laws and then the theory of relativity replaces it to make it better, and that is how science changes. secondly scholars don't disagree on basic stuff as creed. they believe in one god and so on. but when it comes to rules they differ because our understanding is different. its legitimate because they agree with what should be a source for disaggrement

[MsArzoo1]

whats he on about,what a way to brainwash muslims