Free Energy With Searl Effect Generator?

Searl Effect Generator ...
I belive that this guy John Searl is on to something big. To big for me or most anyone to fully understand alone. For what it's worth I'm going to spend some time to try and get one of my own up and running. Trying to cut through his smoke and mirrors will be the hardest part. Any and all support is welcome.

A few links worth a long look ...

http://www.youtube.com/user/johnsearlstory

http://www.youtube.com/user/swallowcommand?blend=23&ob=5

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRealVerbz2

http://www.youtube.com/user/DrTerryMoore

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• John Searl

[unitedworldcare]

yea I've heard that too but it suer looks like he's got something going on.

[MrAwsome514]

@alienhddna You heard right. Searl has lived his entire life puely off of this scam. Ofcourse running this scam is about the closest thing to a job skill the man has. His educational history is... unimpressive to say the least. Ofcourse that was made obvious when he tried to claim a UFO sighting in warminster in the 1960's was actually a test flight of his own space craft. The damn fool forgot to even take into account the eyewitness descriptions... which did not mach the shape of his "craft".

[alienhddna]

i heard searl is fake his motor is junk

[kd7one]

I wonder if it is possible to create a shock absorber using magnetic repulsion. I came up with that thought from the beginning of your video.

[TheBizOMatic]

COPPER COATING REPELS AND PUSHES THE MAGNETS AWAY BUT THE MAGNETS HOLD THEM IN PLACE , YOU NEED TO CHARGE THE COPPER , START THE FLOW OF ELECTRONS , ALSO I THINK THINK THE MAGNETS ARE TILTED TO GIVE THE WAVE FORMATION WITH THE ROLLERS , THINK ROLLER COASTER RIDE UP AND DOWN THIS ADDS TO THE POWER THE GENERATING FIELD AND IS PICKED UP BY THE COILS ......

[Thisguywiththething]

I don't think you "scholars" really understand that this CAN work. Just because nobody has come up with a formula for something so foreign, doesn't mean that its impossible, and if you need to listen to the speculations created by people who don't want free energy in mainstream production (electrical companies) then you're narrow minded. Saying this, you won't have seen how many people have been killed and discredited because of their discovery of free energy.

[Astrodicted]

Flowerbower is the fraud here.It has been stalking all Searl vids for years now....it's called "character assassination".Check his page&comments.You have 2 be stupid if you can't see how obvious it is.Fuck that sell out/shill and his sockpuppets accounts

[larryseyer]

@flowerbower I wish you the best my friend!

[flowerbower]

@larryseyer How can there be any common ground between sense and nonsense; between fact and wishful thinking? There is a big difference between thinking that one knows everything, and knowing which avenues to avoid because they are dead-ends. There is SO much real science to be done. The only way in which to profit from 'free energy' is to find dupes who believe in it and beg them for investment money, or sell them books or plans.

[larryseyer]

@flowerbower I can see that there will be no common ground for us to converse.

Science is your religion and that's fine.

I'm sure you'll have something to come back with that's clever and supported by your education.

But forgetting that, If you already know everything, how can you possibly learn anything?

[flowerbower]

@larryseyer [cont] no room for argument: equations can easily be set up to describe the situation. Even without solving them, one can deduce (using existence theorems and the assumption of a vanishingly small degree of friction) that there are no cyclic solutions and therefore no perpetual motion.

'Magnetic motors' have been a staple tool in the repetoire of investment scammers for some 200 years. Isn't it about time that you caught up?

[flowerbower]

@larryseyer Ah, that tired old excuse: those that do real science know nothing while those who skip lessons are extra-lucid thinkers. Except that a lucid thinker would not confuse cause and effect. The minimum-energy position is not going to change unless an external cause makes it change, and that external cause is usually an electromagnetic field (as in a real electric motor). All that you have done is to re-state the definition of perpetual motion in a slightly different manner. There is ...

[larryseyer]

@flowerbower

It may be that your education is getting in your way. True learning requires an open mind.

What if the nearest minimum-energy position was constantly changing?

The rollers are constantly moving and their poles constantly shifting. Remember they are segmented. Every other segment wants to roll -down-. The others want to roll -up-.

There is no static 'minimum-energy position' because the rollers are constantly moving - i.e. spinning vortex of spinning magnetic cylinders.