Why Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory - A response to npage85 (part2)

Many claim that Intelligent Design is a scientific theory however no one can produce any scientific evidence for it, that is why you can't find any published data in support of it.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• atheism
• atheist
• creationism
• creationist
• intelligent
• design
• scientific
• theory
• npage85

[SadChristian]

4:04

Unless "n" is a decimal, it will make x larger - not smaller.

[DrSim0nSayz]

math isn't really my strong suit, I never make calculations myself.

The point is that t (time for reaction) will decrease when an enzyme is used, i.e. t will have a smaller value.

The more enzyme (n) that is used, the smaller the value of t will be, until of course Vmax is attained.

I think I should have written it like t = x and x is inversely proportional to n or something like that, maybe you can tell me.

[DrSim0nSayz]

You are right, the equation is incorrect, math isnt my strong suit.

The time (t) for the reaction will decrease linearly (or exponentially) with the number of enzymes (n) present (until of course Vmax is attained and the reaction gets saturated)

i.e. the grater the number n is the lower the value for t becomes

maybe it is supposed to be t = 1/n instead of t = x * n

[Minttzz]

its also worth pointing out that scientists have also managed to get RNA to self-replicate and evolve.

ht tp://w ww. sciencemag. org/cgi/content/abstract/11678­56

Also reported here ht tp://w ww. sciencedaily. com/releases/2009/01/090109173­205.htm

[DrSim0nSayz]

Good point as RNA is a strong candidate for abiogenesis.

[ElShadaiLives]

Theory is nothing more than speculation. See etymology of theory. Per that definition this vid fails. Intelligent Design IS a theory. 2nd Einstein believed in Spinoza's God. The "golden ratio" is starting to be seen & applied thoughout the universe, which is definitely proving the existence of Intelligent Design more & more as man begins to understand the complexities of the universe.

Eventually the truth will be known & biased, prejudiced bought & paid Peer Review censorship will be exposed!

[TheJflow008]

@DrSim0nSayz Well this is a funny statement. When we put your own logic into play, (One should be a biologist to discuss, learn, talk about evolution. When a non-biologist tries to talk about biology they fail.) then it is likely you would fail in most calculations. You state that you do not make your own calculations but it is quite obvious that npage85 compiles his biology in the same manor. Since you both share the same system, as does anyone else, then you must fit your own stipulations.

[gekapat]

Irreducibly complex: If I take the computer chip out of my car it won't run anymore, so it is a irreducibly complex part for my car. A car from the 60s has no computer chip and runs fine without them. You can say my car '"evolved" to need that computer chip. If you never knew about cars from the 60s you would wrongly assume that cars always had computer chips and can't run without them. You are failing to see that there were ealier versions of cars that fuctioned differenly.

[ajr5086]

I like this video because I learned something about biology. I never had many biology classes in school, so it really helps out.

Intelligent Design is really just a big hole in the wall. You can only describe it as what it isn't, it upon itself has nothing. The ID was shaped into the form of a scientific theory, but like hole in the shape of a bird the hole is not a bird.

[SadChristian]

Hey, science isn't really my strength. I'm a math guy. I don't understand how you guys can remember all the stuff you learn. I'm just thankful someone understands it. :) Where there is ignorance combined with thinking one understand something, corruption is sure to follow. I think that's what the Catholics did in the early Church pretending to understand God's Word and it's certainly what psychology does today.

Anyway, I think you wanted "t" to be the speed - then n would do what you want.

[aurista25]

I could change my rating afterall. 5 stars.

[aurista25]

Sorry I rated this 1 star, thinking it was another mindless rant of his. I wish I could change my rating. 5 stars.