Scorch's Replication of Ed Leedskanlin's Perpetual Motion Holder Part 2

Hello Everybody and all you science furries out there. ScorchGD here presenting a follow-up video of my replication of Ed Leedskanlins's "Perpetual Motion Holder"

As you can see here I have changed to a better core that is wider and has a load that is the same width as the core.

There was an interesting question regarding what might happen if I lift the load off in a much slower fashion?

As I tried this, at first, it appeared nothing was happening and no flash from the LED.

And here is how this was originally presented, I charge the holder, disconnect the battery, then pull the load off, and because this is a fairly strong attraction, it tends to "pop" off as I pull on it.

This time I am going to simply use a lever for more precise control of removing the load.

And as you can see here, even if I carefully control this, it still produces an energy flash from the LED.

Now I will simply try to "roll" the load off, and, as you can see, there is still an energy discharge.

But, if I do this REALLY slowly and carefully, there is no flash from the LED.
But this does not, necessarily, mean that nothing is happening here.
It simply means that not enough is happening to trigger this particular LED.

SO, I will put a meter on this to see if anything is actually happening.

Ok, as you can see here, even though the LED is not firing, there is still a measurable discharge as indicated on the 20 volt DC scale.

And, as you can see here, even just the residual energy is still resulting in a measurable pulse even though I have not recharged this closed loop system with the battery.

So what does it take to kill this thing?!?

How about if I place a jumper across the coils and short them out?

Well! How about THAT?!?

Even with the coils completely shorted, there is STILL a measureable energy pulse!

Ok all you scientists and engineers, please explain how this system stores substantial magnetic energy, easily convertible to electrical energy, from nothing more than a low grade, steel, loop?

Don't the laws of physics claim this is completely impossible?
What ARE the implications of this?!?
I do wonder how this system might perform with better magnetic materials such as ferrite?
Is there a type of magnetic vortex occurring here?
I wonder if vortex math can explain this within the rigid confines of the current laws of physics?
Is this a challenge to the laws of physics? Is it possible one or more of these laws shall be amended?

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Science
• Technology
• Energy
• Power
• Freedom

[ScorchGD]

Beside my total laziness; I don't think its necessary to make another video for that.

Pretty clear a lighter wire will allow a few more millivolts or a heavier wire less. But it will still be there regardless. Even if I were to solder a solid copper bar across the coils, the energy will still be there in the coils. Try search string: "Coil shorting". You might even find generators that ACCELERATE when the coils are shorted in total violation of physics 'laws'.

[GuardianZeus21]

If I may suggest, Try the same experiment but with your green shorting wire being thicker and then also thinner. As thin as possible. You should see a measurable difference in voltage. The trick would be to find a very consistent way of breaking the magnetic coupling. I have a theory on how and why this works the way it does but it is to long to explain on youtube and it is not math based. :) Thank you for the post, very detailed presentation.