Batalla Capitan Moroni - Book of Mormon Battle on the River Sidon - Alma 43
Uploader Comments (pangea7777)
Top Comments
-
nobody wins in war and spilling blood isn't fun.
All Comments (47)
-
@manowar40 So what you are saying is, that if we can’t prove the Book of Mormon is true because the DNA is not there, then if what your are saying is true. The Bible is not true also. Because DNA research has shown that the first person of the human race was a Black woman that came out of Africa. Not Adam or Eve of the Old Testament. Don’t take my word on this. Google THE NEW EVE
-
@manowar40 yeah we gain over a million people to our faith each year, yes we are a dying bread.
-
(W)e must question if they lived in the manner described in the text and if the content is right. It is essential to make a clear distinction here between archaeological evidence for occupation and evidence of a people's cultural attainments. All the (Great Lakes) books considered here blur this distinction and take evidence of human occupation in the New York area as evidence of past civilizations.". . .
-
@manowar40 sorry son, but it's actaully growing,
it's easy to try to prove things wrong... so easy.
-
why is this spanish?
-
I was amused by the comment that said that the religion was dying. haha. It's the fastest growing religion in the world. and the only one that's not constantly branching off to other less serious or less devoted religious clubs. And what's all this about mormon's liking to kill? come now. Lets not exaggerate. heh heh
And MaoiMeowi2, ?tienes una santa bibilia? debes lier la escritura que pangea dijó. No la conozo, pero se que si lieres, acabara con las dubidas. I don't speak spanish, haha. sorry
-
@manowar40 if you had actually read the Book of Mormon then you would have known that when it speaks of being cursed it is specifically referrring to the decendants of Laman and Lemual that they would be dark spiritually. If you had actually read the Book of Mormon you would have also known that most of those referred to as Nephites were actually of native American Indian blood and were not fair-skinned as you put it. The prophet Mormon himself was likely of Mayan ancestory.
My heart hurts for the Mormon people, One day the truth will be known and you will have to come to grips with the archeological record and DNA. I wish no harm to any of my Mormon friends. I admire your faith and devotion, But history does not support your faith, DNA does not support your faith, Archeology does not support your faith, Geography does not support your faith, All the videos that are made to give credence to your religion are vague and misleading. Sorry, But your religion is dying.
manowar40 1 year ago
@manowar40 If you had actually read the Book of Mormon which you promote yourself to be an expert of then you would know that basically it is the record of two families which came to an already densely-populated area including 2 continents almost three thousand years ago, after countless generations I am no expert but how do you expect their DNA to somehow magically change all other peoples? Archeology, there are numerous examples many of which exist, but what it is really about is Jesus Christ.
pangea7777 1 year ago 4
@pangea7777 I am not the one making the claims that the book of Mormon makes. If there where Hebrews here in north America then we would find there genetic markers among the native population, It's that simple. It doesn't take an expert to dispute the book of Mormon, Most anyone can see the discrepancy that occur in the book of Mormon and doctrine and covenant. I have been studying with two Mormon Missionaries now for about 7month, And they cannot answer many of the questions I ask them
manowar40 1 year ago
@manowar40 the reason there would be little if any genetic markers identifiable is because we are talking about basically two single families that immigrated to an already densely-populated area that included two continents. Both North and South America, with Central America as one very likely spot upon which they landed. You figure in that this was nearly 3000 years ago and with that small of a contribution of semitic DNA the odds of finding markers are close to zero. May God bless you.
pangea7777 1 year ago 2