Unit I: Lec 5 | MIT Calculus Revisited: Single Variable Calculus
Top Comments
All Comments (27)
-
@MrSnobby24 If f had been “any old” function you would be correct. However in this particular problem we have defined f by f(x) = c for all values of x. In other words, we should have (or at least, could have) written f(x) ≡ c or else added the phrase “for all values of x” after f(x) = c.
If this doesn’t answer your question, please write to me at hgross3@comcast.net and I will try to do better
-
8:21 why did he assume that f(a) = c,that`s not always the case,the function could be not continuous at x=a.
-
I Love The Video A More Rigorous Approach to Limits It Can Increase My Knowledge
-
Good, I like that you share this video A More Rigorous Approach to Limits, I wish success always
-
Nice Video A More Rigorous Approach to Limits That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
-
I Really Like The Video A More Rigorous Approach to Limits From Your
-
Your Video A More Rigorous Approach to Limits Is Very Useful Sharing
-
@fsfsto I was wondering if you might want to expand on your comment. I am very interested in hearing both the pros and cons of my presentaitons.
Thanks.
Herb Gross
-
huh?!....
-
@oelefante Thanks for the kind words! I’m not sure what exercises you are looking for. There should be exercises for each lecture in the study guide which is available on the OCW website. If you still have trouble finding them please write to me at hgross3@comcast.net.
Love his accent ! Goodfellas~
ghostandgoblins 10 months ago 9
hard? not listening to his lectures...
hiphopsocnroc 10 months ago 7