10 Second Chrysler Conquest
Uploader Comments (potn586)
All Comments (24)
-
I want My car to do that
-
My speed was actually 125.38 the 79 was a error on the board and my how time goes by, that was sept. 24 1999. I actually let off on that one at the very end not sure how I rememberd that !
-
@SiRHumpAlot924 NO! haha
-
@ChristopherSaindon Automatic Conquests were actually supposedly faster, because the turbo would stay spooled as the transmission would shift!
-
A brand new Conquest TSi was..the most AWESOME experience the first time you sat in it. Had an 88 but was not a racer (auto) This one is just sickening fast.. Even my automatic -- once you were on the interstate -- could ROAR and eat up some pretty fast cars. Great video!
-
@manlavi90 All I am saying is that the 4g63 is a better phucking motor.
-
@SiRHumpAlot924 You find more 4g63's pushing 500 because you seem them around more. You barely see the G54B anymore, but when you find a built one, they're running in the 500's I'm sure.
-
@manlavi90 okay and compare this to the Bushur Racing Starion (Yellow one) that runs eights in the quarter mile. All I am saying is that the 4g63 Sirius motor is a much better platform to start with than the Astron 4g54b that came with the starquests. Hypothetically speaking, how many 4g54's have you seen pushing 500 plus hp? Now compare this to the how many 4g63's (found in evos and eclipses) you see pushing over 500hp?
-
u can see that car is definitely faster than 10 in the 1/8th tho lol and i doubt it did only 79 mph thats suuuuuper slow
This IS a 1/4 mile video and it does run 10s. Get a stopwatch and time it yourself if you want. The car ran 10.61 in the 1/4. The display had not updated yet and was still showing the mph from the 1/8th mile mark. Last report I got, best time was 10.4 @ 128mph....
potn586 8 months ago