Saga - The Road to Valhalla
Uploader Comments (HektorAnasthainomai)
Top Comments
-
@mavmab You should read David Lane, like "Who is white?".
All Comments (44)
-
@HektorAnasthainomai I still don't get this. You don't know what it is that you are disagreeing with, but you are still disagreeing with it!?!?!
-
@cscarnage You confuse me here. Allowing dissent and dissagreement is fundamental to the liberal schema. What is wrong with impatience anyway? Liberalism is about freedom to say and to contest anything one likes to disagree with or to say. An ideology which insists of obedience, compliance and uniform opinion is a long way from liberalism (and not a place I'd want to be).
-
@SteffanLlwyd Wrong. Liberals place the highest possible value on disclosure and freedom of expression THAT THEY AGREE WITH. They don't have particular patience for views they disagree with.
-
@religiofob I feel you are stretching things a bit by equating liberalism with terror and concealment. Liberals place the highest possible value on full disclosure and freedom of expression. I'm also not sure if you are saying the 1960s were more open than now. Conservatives tend to place the highest value on order and social solidarity, and egalitarians on equality. If any of these principles become too dominant life becomes pretty nasty. So I favour 'Clumsy Solutions' instead
-
So very true. Modern science is funded by billions of government dollars going toward thousands of jewish "scientists." I would doubt if ten percent of all modern science is not intellectually dishonest to its very foundation.
-
Modern science is terrorised and controlled by liberals idiots. Read books written in 50's or 60's and compare to modern authors. You will notice how many facts are concealed.
-
@religiofob It is vanishingly imporobable that your good qualities of character and my failings, are explained by our 'races'. As I understand it, scientific truth is defined by what most scientists manage to agree on. It evolves by gradual elimination of mistakes about which scientists try to form a consensus. While a belief in race was quite popular among some biologists in the 19th and early 20th centuries, this is very much a minority opinion among scientists today. That is, not 'fact'.
-
en.wikipedia.orgwiki/Greater_G
ermanic_Reich
Alan R Templeton Washingto University:
"Race is a real cultural, political and economic concept in society, but it is not a biological concept, and that unfortunately is what many people wrongfully consider to be the essence of race in humans -- genetic differences," Templeton said... "There's nothing even like a really distinct subdivision of humanity."
SteffanLlwyd 2 months ago
@SteffanLlwyd
Anthropologist Luigi Cavalli-Sforza of Stanford University directly contradicts this in his many exhaustive works. The difference is that Cavalli-Sforza is a groundbreaking anthropologist and Templeton is white noise.
HektorAnasthainomai 2 months ago 3
@SteffanLlwyd
Look at the human genetic tree of Cavalli-Sforza. Black DNA is on the roots. What does it mean? Black DNA is more backward because it haven't evolved as fast as DNA of other races. Your ideology can't destroy the scientific truth... :)
religiofob 1 month ago
@religiofob
That is actually a fundamental fact of biology that is impossible to dispute. It can be observed immediately. The more simple (primitive) an allele is, the more dominant it is. Because negroid alleles are CLEARLY exponentially more dominant than, say, Nordic alleles (someone who is 1/8 negroid still looks distinctly negroid), that alone is plain proof that alleles common in White European gene pools are more complex (advanced) than those of negroes.
HektorAnasthainomai 1 month ago